Quote:
Once you reply to all these posts of mine regarding the o-zone and radiation, I will happily answer yours. You keep saying I am ignoring your questions but it was me who asked these first. If you cannot answer them properly then simply stop arguing as it shows you know very little about this topic. You cannot just take one side of the argument and not understand the otherside.
I have answered them, the ozone keeps out radiation - what more can I possibly say about that?
Quote:
I will sum it up once again:
If you think radiation doesn't warm stuff up, open your primary school books.
All radiation isn't hot, radiation at the polls has always been higher and there is background radiation in Cornwall from the rocks, yet its not a tropic area now is it?
Quote:
If you think Earths radiation isnt blocked by o-zone, go read up on it.
Where have I said that?
Quote:
When we burn fossil fuels, the gases it releases causes a depletion in the o-zone. This means that the ozone is unable to protect the Earth from these radiation. What fossil fuel we burn doesn't go directly above Britain, it is blown by the wind to surrounding countries and they suffer because of us.
It does not warm up the Earth. The greenhouse effect is based on the argument that the gases and not the ozone heat up the Earth, as the gases get trapped and the heat from the Sun cannot escape.
Quote:
A big hole in the ozone layer has appeared above Australia and that's causing the country/continent to warm up so much. Otherwise explain to me where the hole came from? Or have the scientists edited their results and put a big hole above Australia? Their expertise must actually be on paint tbh.
Austrialia has not 'warmed up so much', it may of escaped your notice but Austrialia is a desert and always has been for much of its modern history. Ozone depletion does not cause higher temperatures, it merely causes more dangerous radiation/UV levels.
Quote:
Now there is a lack of o-zone over Australia, the Sun's radiation is able to hit the Earths surface directly e.g. Australia and that's causing the temperate to rise.
I'll ask one question and it'll stumble this argument right over, how did the last ice ages and other tropical periods occur when we didn't even have factories or cars?
Quote:
You have said radiation doesn't cause climate change / warmer weather. You have said it twice actually. If you still stand by that statement, I am not even going to bother replying to you as it would be just a waste of my time as it shows how you have just seen one side of the argument and are just using that without fully understanding the otherside. Its very clear your expertise is in Politics and how to dodge questions which you cannot answer like my local MP who is annoying as hell, and not in Science.
It is very strange how I am debating with someone about climate change but they refuse to even understand the fact that if you build next to a river you get a flood, not to mention somebody who blindly ignores history which shows that the temperature of the Earth never ever stays the same.
Although when the other side starts to question the opposing sides debating skills that is truly a sign that they seriously have no idea what they are talking about.
Quote:
Now answer every point I have made above made, otherwise don't bother replying / don't expect a reply from me. I am not going to keep repeating myself. If you don't understand the ozone, then stop debating this as it shows your lack of understanding on the topic.
Answered, now explain what I asked you to explain.
