Printable View
Yes, I didn't say they would have kept afloat completely in that post, just for longer (and so would have saved more people). As you said, 5 compartments were damaged, but shutting them off meant that the boat was extremely overweighted at one end, which of course led to it turning into an erection.Quote:
Originally Posted by CokeZero
everyone stop goin off topic and who cares if leeds university is 20 miles away from ya house,anywayit wassomething to do with the hull and it wasnt weak
Well we know two things are right so far...Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJonStress
i care sorry. & i do believe sam would too.Quote:
Originally Posted by CokeZero
I don't like pie.
Ostinato (Forum Super Moderator) - Please don't post pointlessly.
YUH I CARE COS MY WEE LEGS CANNOT WALK 20 MILES AT 1AM MONDAY MORNING
Ostinato (Forum Super Moderator) - Please stay on topic.
There we have it then, it was an iceburg you idiot... You even said it yourself. The first problem was the iceburg, the manufacturing has little to do with it. As long as it floats and keeps the water out and survives a few waves, it is safe. What? They were expected to make a 5 foot deep metal hull? This was pre-1920's I believe, they never really thought about this. If you got this off of some modern site saying stuff about modern technology, I suggest you pick up and read a book about many inventions you see used today and how many flaws they had that were never really known.Quote:
Originally Posted by CokeZero
Here is an example, lead pipes. No one knew they would get lead poisoning, they were only concerned about what going from 1 end to another.
You really are an idiot "/
i dont either. ]:Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJonStress
Ostinato (Forum Super Moderator) - Please stay on topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJonStress
:o Well what do you like?
Ostinato (Forum Super Moderator) - Please stay on topic.
you're gonna make itsnotaniceberg boy cry by goin off topic =((((((!!!!!!