Printable View
There is no kind of bodily indicator if someone is homosexual or not until they reach puberty, so to me it seems most likely that it is the body responding to the persons social situation. This explains why homosexuality thrives in certain areas and circumstances. For example did you know that statistics indicate that for each Brother a Male has he is approximately 33% more likely to be Gay?Quote:
Originally Posted by Catzsy
I agree with this. But as I have said from the start, social acceptance to gay/homosexual = more people experimenting with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPinkPanther
For sure, you can experiment without being gay yourself :). In fact surely it can almost be disproven to be purely genetic because identical twins may have different sexual orientations to one another.Quote:
Originally Posted by Superior
Every forum I use they say it's full of homosexuals.
Yes I see what you are saying but where does the physical attraction come from in the first place? Surely there has to be some genetic predisposition in respect of gay. Bisexual I can understand because it's almost become a fashion accessory these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPinkPanther
I think this says a lot about what websites you use ^^Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRG3
I'm not so sure. Despite all of the research Scientists have found no evidence to support the theory that it is genetic. Of course it would be naive to say this means it cannot be genetic because it clearly could but I personally believe evidence points to it being environmental. For example if some sexual disruption has been caused to someone when they are younger they are more likely to be homosexual. So essentially people who were abused whilst they were young are actually more likely to be Gay, this kind of thing clearly has nothing to do with genetics. Nonetheless it is an interesting topic :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Catzsy
I read somewhere ages ago that it was something to do with the size of the brain on both sides or summet, not sure about that though īcus it was ages ago, and I read some really random **** anyway, so k.
Think it was summet like a straight persons brain is 2% bigger on one side or summet, and a gay/lesbian is the same on both sides, if itīs wrong please donīt ask wth I read in my time but yeah it was ages ago and Iīve probably got it confused with summet.
I don't think it matters.
There all people and people we like to be around or we woulden't be here :).
I'm not against gay parades and so forth, but I don't think they should be funded by the taxpayer, no. I believe the taxpayers money belongs in the pocket of the taxpayer and not pandering to something which (whether people like it or not) is something many would consider distasteful. If people wish to organise, fund and attend them then thats their choice and not that of my own - but I would argue it only serves to harm their 'cause' - a cause which in reality, doesnt exist and is only peddled by the militant gays.Quote:
Originally Posted by Catzsy
I have no problems with gay parades provided taxpayer money doesn't go towards them, however I do believe that gay parades only worsen the divide and give gay people a bad light and henceforth why I personally would never take part in one or be tempted to visit.
The racial issue I touched on was showing the ghettoisation thats occuring in this country, it's not the skin colour I have the problem with - its the problems it creates and will create in the future. To have a minority white area at this point in time in 2010 just shows the uncontrolled pace that we have allowed immigration to take place. It doesn't really tend to be black people either as black immigration was more so after the second world war - and i've pointed to in the past how that type of controlled immigration worked and has continued to work well.
The main groups with the ghettoisation problem concerned are those of non-christian faiths, as well as Eastern European immigation. It needs some form of control otherwise Rivers of Blood will sadly become a fact in the coming decades.
I agree, the idea that surroundings influence you makes no sense at all - you can have the straightest of guys turning out gay. I personally think the link between personality and orientation comes from the genetic side the same it does with women, where most women (and a great portion of gay fellas also) are more feminine. I think personality in general has a lot to do with genes rather than surroundings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Catzsy
she promotes gay rights, she doesnt go around telling everyone to be gay. and why "actually" promotes it, as if it is a bad thing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Superior