I may not be able to do a load of jobs but it's better then not being able to do my best in every job I was in.
Printable View
If you read my above posts, I said I don't actually have a social life right now so I can give the effort. I do fluctuate, especially with content, with how much work I do depending on how it's going but you ask any of my managers and all of them will say I do more than enough top quality work. 4 should be the absolute maximum imo. I realise it's quality not quantity but a lot of the time those 2 interlink :)
But you are saying that your quality is less than a new person assuming your role. Surely we should limit it to 1 job per person for ultimate quality then? The point I'm trying to make, is the point you're trying to make. You do 4 jobs and believe you do a good job, so why does one extra job to 5 suddenly make that different?
I don't understand Laura just said the more roles you have the quality goes down. I don't agree. She's already admitted she has no life whatsoever so let's say on average you have 15 hours spare within a day... 15/4=3.75 that's over three hours for each role and lets face it, moderation doesn't take three hours, it's as you go and doesn't really require you to put 'effort' as such in. Assistant news manager duties, probably around two hours maybe same as content designer and graphics well I'd say around three hours. Of course that's just my personal opinion I could be completely wrong however I highly doubt you'd need all that time for each department.
So yeah I think it's perfectly achievable to be in four roles and put the maximum effort in, this is a Habbo fan site not rocket science.
P.S. Whoever -repped me for 'trying to cause an argument' you couldn't be more wrong. This is just my opinion, sorry if you don't like it.
While I agree to some extent but don't we all remember when Nvrspk4 had load of roles at one stage? It depends on the person really. If a specific staff member can't handle all of their roles then they should seriously think which ones they want to stay in and then leave the others if time management is a big problem. If it's a manager with other roles then they should probably make their management role number 1 and decide to leave X amount of roles.
If one specific person is having trouble then that doesn't mean everyone else will with the same amount of roles. Everyone is different.
I totally agree, annoys me when people with already 3+ jobs get even more jobs that other people could have done better as it is their only job - if that makes sense lol.
Being a manager or assistant is hard enough without having another 3+ jobs, like a lot of managers/assistants they are in at least 4 jobs, which is unfair in some ways as that means people who want to start out don't have an opportunity.
If they are in departments, because there is a lack of applications, fair enough. But if they are in 4+ departments that are reasonably popular - ie. lot's of people applying, or sought-after job then something needs to change.
Quality not quantity.
Looks like you got it back, care to PM me who it was? :P
This thread is quite silly really, we should be thankful that we have people dedicated to Habbox and wish to give their spare time to so many departments, instead, they're just being slated. If people have a problem, they should go about it in the correct manner.