number of jobs a staff can have (at once)

[CaptainAce]

If you can't do a good job and do your fair share. This means 50/50 then quit a few departments is all im saying. Its only an opinion so keep your hair on ya heed. Goodnight.

[Samantha]

Why does it matter? Your point about it being greedy because other people might want roles in the department isn't valid because positions are always becoming available...

Yeah my first post in this thread explains that there are no limits, you just can't go OTT and hire about 200 people .

[lawrawrrr]

It is easily possible for some people to put in top quality work in each department - they won't be able to put their maximum in of course, but it's perfectly possible for people to do a good job.

I don't agree. There's not enough time for someone to put in as much effort as say, someone who didn't have any other jobs. It shows (speaking from both a staff, and manager role here) that when people have multiple jobs, quality goes down. Good does not necessarily equal best, and at the end of the day, it's down to the manager to consider if the person would be the best person for the role.

However, if they've already hired someone, who then gets 5 or 6 jobs, I'm not sure it would be possible to fire them for this, unless they were being negligent.

[CaptainAce]

I don't agree. There's not enough time for someone to put in as much effort as say, someone who didn't have any other jobs. It shows (speaking from both a staff, and manager role here) that when people have multiple jobs, quality goes down. Good does not necessarily equal best, and at the end of the day, it's down to the manager to consider if the person would be the best person for the role.

However, if they've already hired someone, who then gets 5 or 6 jobs, I'm not sure it would be possible to fire them for this, unless they were being negligent.

Agree agree agree with this 10000%

[Catchy]

I don't agree. There's not enough time for someone to put in as much effort as say, someone who didn't have any other jobs. It shows (speaking from both a staff, and manager role here) that when people have multiple jobs, quality goes down. Good does not necessarily equal best, and at the end of the day, it's down to the manager to consider if the person would be the best person for the role.

However, if they've already hired someone, who then gets 5 or 6 jobs, I'm not sure it would be possible to fire them for this, unless they were being negligent.

You have 4 roles... So you're saying the effort and quality you put into them is **** because you have so many?

[Kardan]

I don't agree. There's not enough time for someone to put in as much effort as say, someone who didn't have any other jobs. It shows (speaking from both a staff, and manager role here) that when people have multiple jobs, quality goes down. Good does not necessarily equal best, and at the end of the day, it's down to the manager to consider if the person would be the best person for the role.

However, if they've already hired someone, who then gets 5 or 6 jobs, I'm not sure it would be possible to fire them for this, unless they were being negligent.

Well, you're saying something different now. Of course someone who has less jobs could put more time into the job, but that does not mean that they would be doing a better job. It's quality, not quantity (of hours). It is down to the manager at the end of the day, as you say.

Surely you're saying you should give up three of your roles and replace them with 3 other staff?

[CaptainAce]

You have 4 roles... So you're saying the effort and quality you put into them is **** because you have so many?

Not if 4 was the max amount.

[Kardan]

Not if 4 was the max amount.

So 4 is perfectly acceptable, but 5 is over the top and they're being crap in each department? There shouldn't be a limit if they can perform.

[FlyingJesus]

Damn I always thought I was the most narcissistic person around here, but people genuinely suggesting that things aren't possible because they feel that they personally wouldn't be able to do them takes the cake. I can't juggle, but it doesn't mean I go around telling professional clowns that they can't do it either

[Kardan]

Damn I always thought I was the most narcissistic person around here, but people genuinely suggesting that things aren't possible because they feel that they personally wouldn't be able to do them takes the cake. I can't juggle, but it doesn't mean I go around telling professional clowns that they can't do it either

I think other people shouldn't give birth, because I cannot give birth.