Printable View
Full article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8476238.stmQuote:
The UK terror threat level is being raised from "substantial" to "severe", Home Secretary Alan Johnson has said. The new alert level means a terrorist attack is considered "highly likely". It had stood at substantial since July.
Scary stuff!
:O I wonder why this is?
This is probably due to the new threats the United Kingdom, United States and any other country is getting to be honest.
'tis loosely related to the foiled attack on Christmas Day innit
does it mean were guna die from terroists if we go london this summer LOL?
tbh, why has it taken this long to agree that they need to"upgrade" the threat level and their saying;
"Mr Johnson stressed there was no intelligence to suggest a terrorist attack was imminent."
when this event happed nearly 30 days ago i think the threat level should of gone up couple days after the failed attacks on Christmas day. I really think theirs more in to this then they care to let on.
:S:S:SQuote:
Mr Johnson stressed there was no intelligence to suggest a terrorist attack was imminent.
Regardless of this contradiction, I really don't understand this JTAC thing. How the hell can you possibly say how "likely" a terrorist attack is at any given moment? Additionally, I'm surprised the government would publish such information as surely all it can really do is cause panic?
I still say regardless of what may have happened recently - whether a plane has been flown into a building or a bus blown up or nothing at all - another terrorist could do anything at any time.
Terrorists get on my nerves
Just before an election - now thats a coincidence!
Let me guess, the terrorist attack is going to happen when a training exercise is ongoing, and the training exercise happens to be a simulated version of the actual attack, which will be a huge coincidence. Oh, wait, that was 9/11 and 7/7.
What the hell are you on aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by Wig44.
False flag attacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garion
What war followed 7/7?
I really don't have time for conspiracy theorists.
It was used to justify the 'war on terror'. Say what you like, I'll respect your opinion. Personally I think we grossly underestimate the banks and their ability to profiteer off war. It seems like ********, and most conspiracy theories are, there is even one that claims reptilian aliens morphed into humanoids and carried out the 9/11 attacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garion
It's even filtering into mainstream media now that Al Qaeda isn't real, and than bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11.
Sorry but Al Qaeda is real and the threats are real. Many innocent people were killed or injured during 9/11 or 7/7, I hardly think it was anything done by the government.
They've done a damn good job. It is starting to filter into mainstream media that Al Qaeda isn't real, only time will tell whether they smear the story and anyone who dares report on it, or if the press get to release the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by MattGarner
I hardly think the press will start "publishing" that on TV? Surely. Imagine what the governments will have to say about that. (Because it's basically accusing if they don't have any hard evidence)Quote:
Originally Posted by Wig44.
Of course not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-hYorNi0nA
It's good but some of the facts are slightly iffy in my opinion, other than that it's pretty good.
I sorta agree with Wig44, it proves slightly surreal being how he hasn't been found but I don't believe governments would kill their own people.
Well you wouldn't - you have been socially conditioned to think otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbgtz
You're ridiculous, when I was in the army I was in the intelligence corps and I had access to information that no normal person is privy to, and I can tell you now Al Qaeda is a very real and present threat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wig44.
wig is trolling duh
If you think Al Qaeda is a very real and present threat you were not as privy to real information as you would like to think. I'll ask, do you have a lot of money, ties with rich elite families, years of experience. I don't think so. From pictures you've posted you don't look any older than 18 (I'm not trying to offend here).Quote:
Originally Posted by Garion
No, I'm not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefy09
Seems to have come out of the blue.