Sierk *****ed us all over.

[A4AOwen]

If you don't like it leave.

The main reason in my opion that they are unfair is because they are all competing for Moderator Logs because if you don't get a certain anmount you are fired so maybe there should be no Moderator Reports just a check every 2 weeks to see if they are doing ok.

[348GTS]

I completely agree with this thread:
- Rules and infractions are just a competition between mods.
- All the rules are stupid now, why should saying you will rep back against the rules? Because alot of people used to say it so mods can give out more infractions and get their logs up.
- Yes this forum used to be good before all the mods and managers and staff and god knows what else. This is my third account here because of bans and stuff.

its true.

[e5]

Seriously. The forum used to be good. Like a year ago. There wasnt 20000 mods all over the forum, having an org'asm whenever you say "stupid" or tell someone to shut up. You act like we're all 8 year olds. I mean come on! I bet you like 90% of this forum is over 13. You get called stupid when you're like 6? WOW! Its pathetic.

Ever since DJ left these forums, thanks to you, it sucks. It completely blows. Everyone needs to follow stupid little rules. For example, I said that I would rep you back, because I'm trying to be nice. Oh no, that might teach some little 6 year old something stupid, so lets give out an infraction for that. I mean come on? Its a friggin online forum. You don't go out and give infractions to someone for called someone stupid. DJ3000 wasn't that stupid, and he didn't give out pointless infractions, but obviously, your word goes, as shown by DJ. Banned for avoiding the filter? Pssh, Jrh2002 was better than you, and trust me, thats an insult.

ps: Ill bet anyone my habbo account that ill get like -200 rep from all of the stupid sierk lovers and I'll be banned, LOL.

I sorta agree with you, they think they are big becausr they moderate an online forum and think they can just go round doing what they want, its a online forum for crying out loud, all you have to do let it go unless someone is being a cmplete poo ed, but sum1 saying stupid or cvhanging subject should be allowed, fgs...

If you don't like it leave.

The main reason in my opion that they are unfair is because they are all competing for Moderator Logs because if you don't get a certain anmount you are fired so maybe there should be no Moderator Reports just a check every 2 weeks to see if they are doing ok.

so you basically encouraGING INFRACTIONS, HOW SAD

[YoManGo!]

Personally I like the very authoritarian, almost Nazi-esque style of running a forum that Habbox has. So you don't fit in their idea of a perfect Aryan habboxer, you try and fight back it's always gonna be you against the masses, and you'll lose, or worse, get infractioned.

I also like infractions, I love each one more than the last, the thrill of collecting them adds so much value to my life.

Heil Sierk!

[e5]

On the basis of your above post, it seems most of the infractions are fair anyway. It's not the infractions you have a problem with, it's the rules. You broke the rules and you got a fair infraction.

the rules DO stink, asking for rep or calling someone stupid is gay, try going on www.cybertechhelp.com or something they aint strict at all they VERY friendly ADULT so basically all these mods are a VERY childish

oh and spudee try spelling hail right. jeez

[YoManGo!]

Hail is not the same as heil.
Try learning about what you think you know so much about before making yourself look stupid in front of everyone.

[---MAD---]

If you don't like it leave.

The main reason in my opion that they are unfair is because they are all competing for Moderator Logs because if you don't get a certain anmount you are fired so maybe there should be no Moderator Reports just a check every 2 weeks to see if they are doing ok.

Its funny you would say that, you started that rule and the moderator reports but I ended it. Moderator reports now tell you how to improve and how you are doing instead of saying "GET MORE MOD LOGS!!!". There is no set number of mod logs you need to get or you get fired.

but you guys really need to admit, the infractions given out are stupid. I've gotten three : 1 for calling someone stupid, one for telling someone to shut up and another one for asking for rep.

pssh

edit' gobbing off and insulting people? You really believe that calling someone stupid (who posted homosexual images) and telling someone to shut up because they were acting like a mod, is insulting?

oh god, the people on these forums must be very mentally unstable.

Yes but the reason we dont want people to call each other stupid is it creates arguements between members which we try to control as much as possible.

[zak-x]

Its funny you would say that, you started that rule and the moderator reports but I ended it. There is no set number of mod logs you need to get or you get fired.

Lol owen got ownd, i think he just trying to become a mod..

AND YEHHHHH HABBOX FORUM IS RUBBISH LOOOL i just come on to laugh at the stupid people when im bored

[Axel]

The scam rule is the stupidest thing ever. If someone says 'this guy scams' without any proof, no one will believe him anyway, so I don't know why the contents of the post should be removed and you get an infraction. And even if we have full proof, we're still not allowed to name scammers. For example, I got scammed by (cannot be named because I'll get an infraction) and I had video proof of it. It showed the name of his character on the video. And on the forum, he had confirmed his name. I pm'ed Dan and he forwarded it to an admin, and they said it wasn't enough proof? ...

[YoManGo!]

The scam rule is the stupidest thing ever. If someone says 'this guy scams' without any proof, no one will believe him anyway, so I don't know why the contents of the post should be removed and you get an infraction. And even if we have full proof, we're still not allowed to name scammers. For example, I got scammed by (cannot be named because I'll get an infraction) and I had video proof of it. It showed the name of his character on the video. And on the forum, he had confirmed his name. I pm'ed Dan and he forwarded it to an admin, and they said it wasn't enough proof? ...

That rule is fair, otherwise you'd get people posting names of people just to get at them, and everyone is entitled to being innocent till proven guilty.

However, you do have a point on that one occasion.