New ODI rankings..

[Smiddy]

[IMG]http://www.****************/uploads/ab5c8e48a6.png[/IMG]


Although I haven't a clue how they work out the points... yet

If you're wondering why I posted this, it's because since Australia have now lost 5 out of there last 6 ODI's (3 times to England, twice to New Zeland), and South Africa (the Protea's) have taken the top place.

This is the first time Australia haven't led this table since it was invented in August 2003.

lol@England being 7th, we still have some improving to do, eh.

[Lysine]

England will always be low down the table lol

2,000 posts

[Smiddy]

England will always be low down the table lol

2,000 posts

If we beat 1 side higher up in the table than us, I think we'd move up considerably.

[Lysine]

We can beat a few of the teams above us on a GOOD day

[Smiddy]

I think if we beat Australia again, we'd be either level with Sri Lanka or India o_O

[F32]

I think this is utter bull the way they work this out.

England havn't played an ODI against many of those teams for a heck of a long time.

It's unfairly judged imo.

It should be:

Australia
South Africa
New Zealand
England
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
India
W.I
Bangladesh
Zimbabwe
Kenya

imo of course.

[Smiddy]

There is no way I'd put Pakistan below England in ODI atm, Pakistan beat us 5 - 0 in an ODI series in the summer...

I'm wondering if New Zeland will now be 3rd because they beat Australia again (and that was a good match..!)

[F32]

It's not just team a v team b though.

It's team a v team b v team c and so on.

I don't explain myself well but I dislike the way they rank.

[Smiddy]

It's not just team a v team b though.

It's team a v team b v team c and so on.

I don't explain myself well but I dislike the way they rank.

I know what you mean, I think.. if i'm right then you'd prefer them to just have individual records for each int country with there ranking against 1 team, not based in a group of teams, yes?

[OMGitsaROSS]

England tests: good
ODIs: alright...