9/11 Conspiracies - What do you think happened? - [Closes 13/05/07]

[madmike666]

A plane flew into a building. same happend with other building.

[3d]

Ok i will attempt to answer them

1. Maybe because there was bombs inside the aircraft and/or there was gas/oil in the building and when the planes crashed it would obv start a fire which would set off the gas. I have no idea maybe it was unseen ? link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0Qu6eyyr4c

2. I have no idea about that but maybe so it wasnt obtained by anyone else (in my opinon it was a missile no a plane that hit pentagon but thats just my opinon)

3. read no. 2

4. i couldnt say you never know why i suppose could of been faults you never know

5. Isnt it obvious? Hes obvious in amazing hiding...to my awareness no one is actually looking for him in afghanistan

6. No idea i didnt even know so im not going to bother researching

7. like i said in no.1

8. no idea

9. i dont know nothing about planes so check if someone has said anything to that

10. This is why i stated in my eyes it was a missile

TBH, Loose Change Pretty Much Answers This Question;

On That Day The Following Things SUPPOSEDLY Happened;

4 Planes Were Hijacked, Two Flew Into The Twin Towers, One Into The Pentagon And ONE Crashed 30 Miles From The Whitehouse, Yet THESE Questions Remain Unasked;

1. WHY Did The Twin Towers Fall STRAIGHT Down Like A Controlled Demolition? Why Also Did WTC9 Fall Down Like A Demoltion When It Wasnt Even Hit?

2. Why Did Security Officials [ FBI & CIA ] Confiscate CCTV Footage From A Petrol Station Accros The Road From The Pentagon, This Camera Would've Seen EXACTLY What Happened To The Pentagon And Various EX-STAFF Say That They Watched That CCTV Footage And It Wasnt A Plane That Hit That Building

3. Why Did An EX-Marine Who Was Walking Past The Pentagon At The Time Say That The Explosion Sounded & Felt Like A Small Missile?

4. Why Did It Take 46 Minuites For Military Jets To Scramble AFTER Knowing Planes Had Been Hijacked. Why Were They Not Quicker Having Been FULLY Trained Against Terrorist Attacks.

5. Why Was The Blame Pinned On Osama Bin Laden And Yet He Still Hasnt Been Captured 6 Years Later?

6. Why Did The Owner Of The WTC Take Out A MAJORLY Big Insurance Polocy When He Bought The Lease 6 Weeks Earlier [ 3.4 BILLION ]

7. Why Were Explosions Seen When The WTC' Collapsed?

8. Why Did Survivers Hear Constant Banging As If Explosions Above Their Heads? Mainly Talking Staircase 2B

9. How Can A Boeing 747 Make A 330 Degree Turn At 500 MPH?

10. Why Wasnt The Hole In The Pentagon Big Enough To Fit A Boeing 747 In The Hole?

11. WATCH THE FIRST 10 MIUNITES OF THE VIDEO BELOW! YOU HAVE TOO!


Loose Change;
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...q=Loose+Change

Make Your Own Opinions But I STRONGLY Urge You To Watch That Video If You Have An Hour And A Half Spare

Now before you start criticising my answers i dont sit here reading/watching conspiracies so its just general knowledge i suppose from what my answers where

[Ashhizzle]

I dont see where the debate is. Planes hit buildings, they fell down. What is there to debate?

Theres some people who beleive it was set up, Don't you think its a bit suspicous that the Owner of the buildings took out insurance two days before the 'accident'

[Lost-Shark]

Tbh, Bush sucks u know wot,
So does al queda and this was all down to Us + Americans with the Jews In Jerusalum. I dnt rli care bwt all this and people feel free to have a good arguement cos im out of this one!

[Mentor]

[COLOR=Black][B]TBH, Loose Change Pretty Much Answers This Question;

On That Day The Following Things SUPPOSEDLY Happened;

4 Planes Were Hijacked, Two Flew Into The Twin Towers, One Into The Pentagon And ONE Crashed 30 Miles From The Whitehouse, Yet THESE Questions Remain Unasked;

Loose change is mostly a load of crap, like alot of the moon landing conspircys it holds no real wieght.

1. WHY Did The Twin Towers Fall STRAIGHT Down Like A Controlled Demolition?

The trade centers were actually designed with the idea something like this could actually happen, if you match the size of the planes up with the towers the plane's are almost the same size, its incredible they stayed up at all, but the design, kept it standing, if it was going to topple sideways dont you think a plane flying straight in to it would have pushed the building over?[/quote]

Why Also Did WTC9 Fall Down Like A Demoltion When It Wasnt Even Hit?

World Trade center 9? i thought there was only two of em.

2. Why Did Security Officials [ FBI & CIA ] Confiscate CCTV Footage From A Petrol Station Accros The Road From The Pentagon, This Camera Would've Seen EXACTLY What Happened To The Pentagon And Various EX-STAFF Say That They Watched That CCTV Footage And It Wasnt A Plane That Hit That Building

I wonder, an international act of terrorism, an issue of national securty? and your surprised the FBI/CIA wanted footage of the event ?
Plus how would you tell, CCTV camra's have very slow frame rates, planes fly very fast.

3. Why Did An EX-Marine Who Was Walking Past The Pentagon At The Time Say That The Explosion Sounded & Felt Like A Small Missile?

Probably becuse that what a plane sounds like when it wacks in to somthing at high speed, the only difference is in the payload, aircraft fule isnt quite as explosive.

4. Why Did It Take 46 Minuites For Military Jets To Scramble AFTER Knowing Planes Had Been Hijacked. Why Were They Not Quicker Having Been FULLY Trained Against Terrorist Attacks.

Incompidence sounds more likely than a planned act, think how many people would have to be in with the conspircy to carry that off.

5. Why Was The Blame Pinned On Osama Bin Laden And Yet He Still Hasnt Been Captured 6 Years Later?

because hes good at hideing o.0 better question is why did american exert most its military effort invading a country with nothing to do with the incident.

6. Why Did The Owner Of The WTC Take Out A MAJORLY Big Insurance Polocy When He Bought The Lease 6 Weeks Earlier [ 3.4 BILLION ]

When you own a massively important building worth a massive amount it would be stupid not to buy a big insurance. its odd it wasn't done immidetly.

7. Why Were Explosions Seen When The WTC' Collapsed?

becuse a plane with most its tank full of fule were embed in the side of the building.

8. Why Did Survivers Hear Constant Banging As If Explosions Above Their Heads? Mainly Talking Staircase 2B

Thats called supports buckling.

9. How Can A Boeing 747 Make A 330 Degree Turn At 500 MPH?

Quite easly if your not limiting the size of the ark it makes doing it.

10. Why Wasnt The Hole In The Pentagon Big Enough To Fit A Boeing 747 In The Hole?

The hold in the pentagon was between 16 to 20 foot right?
A 757's body is 12 ft 4in wide and 13 ft 6in high...

Adds up to me o.0 wings, nose, extra's aint gona make it threw a reinforced concrete wall, so the rest doesnt really count.

11. WATCH THE FIRST 10 MIUNITES OF THE VIDEO BELOW! YOU HAVE TOO!

Seen it.

[3d]

Tbh, Bush sucks u know wot,
So does al queda and this was all down to Us + Americans with the Jews In Jerusalum. I dnt rli care bwt all this and people feel free to have a good arguement cos im out of this one!

sorry but what in the world do jews have to do with this pmsl

[RedStratocas]

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...q=Loose+change

Watch that, It's based around science and obviousness, I was quite convinced after watching it.

I know its 1 hour and a half long, but its seriouly worth it.
Or just bookmark it and come to it later when your bored?
Eitherway you should really watch it to get an idea about what happend.

Loose Change is full of lies and stupidity. I found 2 mistakes on my own the first time watching it, so that makes me think the rest of what they say is wrong as well. Not to mention some of the evidence they manipulated to make you agree with them. Like the whole "twin towers in crosshairs on the terrorist reports" thing: The WTC was bombed in '91, so it was seen as a symbol of terrorism. So either the guys who made it are stupid and didnt know about those attacks, or they did know and are manipulating what the facts really are and are liars. Either way, it disproves the rest. Why would the government give out stupid hints on report covers that they murdered almost 3 thousand people? It makes no sense.

Okay, maybe jet fuel cant get hot enough to MELT steal at 825 degrees C, but steel looses half it's strength at 648 degrees C. Not only that, but if you saw the video footage, there was a huge 747 plane that crashed into the side of the building. They didnt take that into account when they were calculating how long it take steel to melt did they? If jet fuel was poured onto a floor and set on fire, you'd have an arguement that it shouldn't have fallen. But there was a gigantic hole in the side of the building that Im sure helped with the falling process.

[awelsh]

Well there are two answers:

1. Hi-Jackers caused all of the destruction and terrorist etc...

2. It was a set up, anyone notic how the buildings fell down directly not al slopes etc... That cant be right, Some documentarys have said there are bombs set at the base of floors that were triggered, how else could they have fallen straight down??

I myself find 2. more plausable myself. But thats just me

[Mentor]

Well there are two answers:

1. Hi-Jackers caused all of the destruction and terrorist etc...

2. It was a set up, anyone notic how the buildings fell down directly not al slopes etc... That cant be right, Some documentarys have said there are bombs set at the base of floors that were triggered, how else could they have fallen straight down??

I myself find 2. more plausable myself. But thats just me

only if you forget the fact that the twin towers were designed with the idea a terroist attack on them could happen, and that a direct collapse was just part of the design for such a tall building. if a 500 mile per hour 747 slamming in to the side takeing out half the buildings supports, didn't knock it over or even make in bend slightly do you really think its just randomly going to pivert sideways?

[3d]

only if you forget the fact that the twin towers were designed with the idea a terroist attack on them could happen, and that a direct collapse was just part of the design for such a tall building. if a 500 mile per hour 747 slamming in to the side takeing out half the buildings supports, didn't knock it over or even make in bend slightly do you really think its just randomly going to pivert sideways?

what i was going to say

they were built so that they were protected from natural accidents eg hurricanes earthquakes etc thats why they would topple over so many people dont understand that bit