Taj Mahal

[-:Undertaker:-]

LOL!
That made me laugh, seriously.
If you think India is rich then maybe you should actually go there and look?
Even if they were rich, err they would still need aid as India has over a billion people .. kinda hard to help everyone.
Only a minor population there is rich.
You have kids who work there as they have no money ... yea they are rich >.>

Oh and actually, without the countries England robbed / ruled over, it would be in a worse state atm. Results show that most jobs in this country are created by people from different countries.

Mate, they are one of the top growing economic countrys and they have Billions but just don't give it to the people.

Let's sort out BRITAINS problems first before we sort out other coutnrys problems.

Also if England wouldn't if had an Empire, countrys like South Africa and the old Zimbarbwe wouldn't be like they are today, although since we gave Zimbarbwe independance it's in meltdown and is about to collapse.

[Soil]

Mate, they are one of the top growing economic countrys and they have Billions but just don't give it to the people.

Let's sort out BRITAINS problems first before we sort out other coutnrys problems.

Also if England wouldn't if had an Empire, countrys like South Africa and the old Zimbarbwe wouldn't be like they are today, although since we gave Zimbarbwe independance it's in meltdown and is about to collapse.

They maybe one of the top growing economic countries in the world, but they are still poor. England is richer. Britain does get aid when they have disasters here :s And sort our Britains problems? Well, why go to war then?
And SA and Zimbabwe were probably better before the British took control.
Britain takes control of countries, takes what they need and then they just leave.
E.g - Iraq. They went there, got the oil, and now Iraq is in a worse state. It was better with Saddam as you had less deaths. Now England is slowly moving troops out.
E.g - India / Pakistan / Bangladesh. Britail ruled the country. Took the gold and diamonds ... and then got kicked out.

[-:Undertaker:-]

They maybe one of the top growing economic countries in the world, but they are still poor. England is richer. Britain does get aid when they have disasters here :s And sort our Britains problems? Well, why go to war then?
And SA and Zimbabwe were probably better before the British took control.
Britain takes control of countries, takes what they need and then they just leave.
E.g - Iraq. They went there, got the oil, and now Iraq is in a worse state. It was better with Saddam as you had less deaths. Now England is slowly moving troops out.
E.g - India / Pakistan / Bangladesh. Britail ruled the country. Took the gold and diamonds ... and then got kicked out.

Yet India can afford to build itself and have a Nuclear Weapons system?, A 'poor' country can't afford Nuclear Weapons.

We don't get AID, were was our AID for the floods from the EU?, Iraq, yes it was better with Saddam because he could rule and he gave them water, security and food and freedom, these other countrys had no water and no food when Britain came, Zimbarbwe used to be known as the 'Bread basket of Africa' now it produces no food at all ~ Better off without Britain? I don't think so.

I just say, if Africa and all these countrys hate us so much, then we shouldn't give them anything or help them at all.

[Soil]

Yet India can afford to build itself and have a Nuclear Weapons system?, A 'poor' country can't afford Nuclear Weapons.

We don't get AID, were was our AID for the floods from the EU?, Iraq, yes it was better with Saddam because he could rule and he gave them water, security and food and freedom, these other countrys had no water and no food when Britain came, Zimbarbwe used to be known as the 'Bread basket of Africa' now it produces no food at all ~ Better off without Britain? I don't think so.

I just say, if Africa and all these countrys hate us so much, then we shouldn't give them anything or help them at all.

Welcome to the 21st century where a lot of countries now have nuclear weapons to PROTECT themselves from countries trying to take over
And another reason India has nuclear weapon is cos of Pakistan - constant war. The floods here wasnt that bad. I just went to India and kolkatta was TOTALLY flooded - worse than the flood here. No aid was given out. So err, I dont see how India are stealing from Britain?
And about Zimbabwe - maybe because Britain came and destroyed it? Its hard for a country to develop if its been ruled over. Its called politics.

I personally have nothing against Britain, but I just hate it when people here are racist or laugh at poor countries. The fact is that this country got rich by stealing from others.

And dont say India isnt poor. If you have never been there then you cant really comment. I was born there and lived there for 10 years, so dont tell me you know more about India than me. No doubt there is less poverty there now, but a lot of people are still homeless etc.

And oh, Africa etc hate this country so much as it ruined them.