Scammers rule

[LeftForDead]

Which is where proof comes into it.

BUT YOU CAN FAKE PROOF!!!!!

[ReviewDude]

Oh great... Another one of these threads. Why don't you search this Forum, and see the reasons why every time we've defended (quite rightly) this rule :rolleyes:

[The Professor]

Oh great... Another one of these threads. Why don't you search this Forum, and see the reasons why every time we've defended (quite rightly) this rule :rolleyes:

Ditto.

Also, it is pretty easy to get a scammer named and shamed if you have proof by PMing micky.blue.eyes or Youheard and asking them to be put on the untrusted list. If they deem the proof to be valid, they go on the list. Forum management are happy because it bypasses the arguments in the "he scammed me" threads and the person is happy because the scammer got named. Wheres the problem?

[ReviewDude]

This reminds me of:

[Cixso]

Obviously it should be re looked. as many users agree with me.

[LeftForDead]

Obviously it should be re looked. as many users agree with me.

And many users disagree and there is a good reason too.

[ReviewDude]

And many users disagree and there is a good reason too.

Very true.

Also, the argument that 'many people agree' falls apart when you think most users would enjoy the reputation, swearing, image and private messaging rules changed or removed. But they're there for a reason, and there to stay.

[Cixso]

Very true.

Also, the argument that 'many people agree' falls apart when you think most users would enjoy the reputation, swearing, image and private messaging rules changed or removed. But they're there for a reason, and there to stay.

Not all rules are there to stay. Example is the runescape trading accounts.

Doesn't harm to ask does it? No.

[LeftForDead]

Not all rules are there to stay. Example is the runescape trading accounts.

Doesn't harm to ask does it? No.

Does when u break the forum rules.

[ReviewDude]

Not all rules are there to stay. Example is the runescape trading accounts.

Doesn't harm to ask does it? No.

Once? Fine. But this is not a new idea. You are not the revolutionary you probably think you are. You can't even use 'Search', can you?