More / Better Moderators needed.

[Lycan]

Well, If Each Department on the forum (How many are there???) in its self decides a representive.

Then we have Mad + say Nvr / Josh etc etc whoever.


AS you say member choosing might be a problem which is why i think the managment should have only a final say in the matter rather then an actual choosing part.


The Activity of the Council should be organised by 1 Person, a member who can organise meetings etc and act as a public rep to the rest of the forum ... (as a already staff member maybe ignored as members may seem to be more trustworthy as they were voted in by the members rather then selected)

I would also not mind not being a part of it, although i would actually want to be involved... not important tho, as you say it would be for the better of the forum

[today]

Well, If Each Department on the forum (How many are there???) in its self decides a representive.

Then we have Mad + say Nvr / Josh etc etc whoever.


AS you say member choosing might be a problem which is why i think the managment should have only a final say in the matter rather then an actual choosing part.


The Activity of the Council should be organised by 1 Person, a member who can organise meetings etc and act as a public rep to the rest of the forum ... (as a already staff member maybe ignored as members may seem to be more trustworthy as they were voted in by the members rather then selected)

Yes, this is why i think a application system would be best similar to Moderation which has many questions and such. Though having a 'leader' may be a good idea but then it would become a stagg usergroup and its not really, though what would the 'rep' do in general? I think letting MAD have the final say is alright though before he got the final say maybe the idea must have 4/6 votes for it before MAD had a look? This way it would stop him wasting time and just generally saying no to all the idea's.

Let's name the departments

News
Articles
Graphics
Moderation
Habbox Help Desk

Thats all? So one from each department correct? Thats 5 for staff, including MAD and another senior member 7 Staff in total then we'll need 5 normal users to equal it out (not including mad and senior staff)

As i said they'll discuss the ideas at a later date after most of the council said yes.

[Lycan]

Yes, this is why i think a application system would be best similar to Moderation which has many questions and such. Though having a 'leader' may be a good idea but then it would become a stagg usergroup and its not really, though what would the 'rep' do in general? I think letting MAD have the final say is alright though before he got the final say maybe the idea must have 4/6 votes for it before MAD had a look? This way it would stop him wasting time and just generally saying no to all the idea's.

Let's name the departments

News
Articles
Graphics
Moderation
Habbox Help Desk

Thats all? So one from each department correct? Thats 5 for staff, including MAD and another senior member 7 Staff in total then we'll need 5 normal users to equal it out (not including mad and senior staff)

As i said they'll discuss the ideas at a later date after most of the council said yes.

A Majority vote would be essential anyway, shows a general opinion if something is liked or not and requires both members and staff liking the idea. before its pushed forward. Mad or another managment rep would need to be throughout to point out if things are impossible, why they are impossible and how we can get around them.


Perhaps a list of requirments for anyone applying. idea?

[today]

A Majority vote would be essential anyway, shows a general opinion if something is liked or not and requires both members and staff liking the idea. before its pushed forward. Mad or another managment rep would need to be throughout to point out if things are impossible, why they are impossible and how we can get around them.


Perhaps a list of requirments for anyone applying. idea?

• Must have posted at least 'x' threads suggesting idea's (Simple search will result that, in the feedback forum)
• Must have been a member 'x' months, weeks (To show they are active and do enjoy Habbox)
• Must have less then 'x' infractions
• Friendly attutide
• Communication Skills
• Able to come online 'x' times a week to discuss ideas.
• Able to write long essays (to backup your points)
• Why you'll like to be part of the team.
• Able to come up with other ideas
• Able to read long threads and see both sides of a idea.

They alright, anymore?

[Cixso]

• Must have posted at least 'x' threads suggesting idea's (Simple search will result that, in the feedback forum)
• Must have been a member 'x' months, weeks (To show they are active and do enjoy Habbox)
• Must have less then 'x' infractions
• Friendly attutide
• Communication Skills
• Able to come online 'x' times a week to discuss ideas.
• Able to write long essays (to backup your points)
• Why you'll like to be part of the team.
• Able to come up with other ideas
• Able to read long threads and see both sides of a idea.

They alright, anymore?

I think the infraction rule shouldn't the there, as people do change.

[today]

I think the infraction rule shouldn't the there, as people do change.

I did wonder i was going to say unless the infractions are based upon swearing and generally being rude (If you had other infractions it wouldnt matter / depend what they were)

But i werent sure.

[Soil]

Any comments from management?

[the wombats]

• Must have posted at least 'x' threads suggesting idea's (Simple search will result that, in the feedback forum)
• Must have been a member 'x' months, weeks (To show they are active and do enjoy Habbox)
• Must have less then 'x' infractions
• Friendly attutide
• Communication Skills
• Able to come online 'x' times a week to discuss ideas.
• Able to write long essays (to backup your points)
• Why you'll like to be part of the team.
• Able to come up with other ideas
• Able to read long threads and see both sides of a idea.

They alright, anymore?

i hate that infraction one. the new mods are basically wrecking other peoples chances of becoming a mod by giving out loads of pointless warnings and infractions. i agree with your criteria. i mean, there's a lot of people who have a good few infractions and can't be hired cos if it who'd be better than this bunch.

[today]

Any comments from management?

Woah 14 pages, lmao.

Yuhh comments would be nice mate. :]


Edit: Craig see my other post.

[Catzsy]

i hate that infraction one. the new mods are basically wrecking other peoples chances of becoming a mod by giving out loads of pointless warnings and infractions. i agree with your criteria. i mean, there's a lot of people who have a good few infractions and can't be hired cos if it who'd be better than this bunch.

I agree with Craig. Infractions can be a symptom of a member's frustration with the forum. I am not saying all because there is always a small hardcore who just like to break rules - as simple as that. I don't believe a majority matters because policy won't be made at the council. That will remain as it should with Senior Habbox Management. It really is more of a think tank and
a way to let them know what the members see as improvements perhaps any problems arising in Habbox in the general organisation. It should be constructive and not used as a 'shoutbox' so to speak.