Don't get me wrong...

[Nick.]

When I was a super moderator I got fired after 2 weeks of inactivity. Just shows how corrupt Habbox is, and it's getting worse.

[Hecktix1]

So yet again, Habbox Management is so incompetent they start ignoring a thread when their first response gets reasonably criticised.

...

[joshuar]

We always reply to threads that have a complaint about us, to show we don't ignore you, I haven't seen a thread recently where one of us haven't replied, and ---MAD--- has already replied anyway.

I would think it's only fair that someone who has been inactive for that long is removed, however, it's not my decision to make.

It isn't a rule for staff to be active on the forum I believe, however, it's how we gague activity for staff members as it is the primary place for Staff to obtain information for their department.

[Nixt]

We always reply to threads that have a complaint about us, to show we don't ignore you, I haven't seen a thread recently where one of us haven't replied, and ---MAD--- has already replied anyway.

I would think it's only fair that someone who has been inactive for that long is removed, however, it's not my decision to make.

It isn't a rule for staff to be active on the forum I believe, however, it's how we gague activity for staff members as it is the primary place for Staff to obtain information for their department.

The Forum is the place where (assistant) department managers run their departments though; so if they don't come online, they should remain manager?

[sierk1]

I don't see the relation between Shabbs and you though. As Mad explained we decided to keep Shabbs on so he could still help out when necessary. It shouldn't put any extra strain on the other news managers, as besides Shabbs there should be an active manager and assistant manager. Shabbs is only for backup so to speak. Of course if he also is not active anymore to help as backup it will be time for him to leave, but there is no urgency.

Going against your own manager and in that way abusing your powers seems something completely different to me. I don't remember if I said the thread was allowed, but in any case a staff member shouldn't put back a thread that was just removed by his/her manager.

With Shabbs we know that he is less active, and we are thankfull if he still helps out when necessary.

This is laughable. How can somebody still be a great asset if they haven't signed on for 3 months? You know you seem to have different standards. When I moved back a thread in the heat of the moment you said it was serious power abuse and firing was a must! In fact you have said it again lately. This is notwithstanding the fact that I had no previous warnings/infractions for anything. The strange thing is that I was reading Sierk's comments about it the other day and he said the thread was allowed so was it power abuse to move it in the first place as it was a legitimate request for you to consider?

In fact Sierk also said that I could come back and didn't see any problem so is that fine by you? Sorry about this and I have not complained before
but your post is a little inconsistent considering your past actions.

[-:Undertaker:-]

When I was a super moderator I got fired after 2 weeks of inactivity. Just shows how corrupt Habbox is, and it's getting worse.

Something needs sorting to be honest, I don't think Habbox has a 'community' anymore if you like, I have recently noticed the difference between ClubHabbo and Habbox, Habbox seems all dead and well, ClubHabbo feels like everyone knows eachother.

I think the best part of Habbox is the staff though, if I wasn't working with great staff in Rare Values I wouldn't of been there

[Immenseman]

Hasn't been online for months, oh dear. Most people would be fired.

Something needs sorting to be honest, I don't think Habbox has a 'community' anymore if you like, I have recently noticed the difference between ClubHabbo and Habbox, Habbox seems all dead and well, ClubHabbo feels like everyone knows eachother.

I think the best part of Habbox is the staff though, if I wasn't working with great staff in Rare Values I wouldn't of been there

I have been on both forums and I personally enjoy habbox a hell of a lot more. Although that's probably because I know a lot of people from habbox and not many from clubhabbo. Habbox has a lot more users and I still think there is a decent community on habbox.

[---MAD---]

When I was a super moderator I got fired after 2 weeks of inactivity. Just shows how corrupt Habbox is, and it's getting worse.

I am not sure how that shows Habbox is corrupt or anything like that. Super moderators have to be active daily as much of the moderating relies on them. I am not sure whats up with elkaa though, he may be having some internet problems or something, we will just have to wait and see what's going on.

The deal with shabbs is that he is a backup (as sierk has already said above) for when both the assistant manager and manager of the news manager are away or busy for example.

[Catzsy]

I don't see the relation between Shabbs and you though. As Mad explained we decided to keep Shabbs on so he could still help out when necessary. It shouldn't put any extra strain on the other news managers, as besides Shabbs there should be an active manager and assistant manager. Shabbs is only for backup so to speak. Of course if he also is not active anymore to help as backup it will be time for him to leave, but there is no urgency.

Going against your own manager and in that way abusing your powers seems something completely different to me. I don't remember if I said the thread was allowed, but in any case a staff member shouldn't put back a thread that was just removed by his/her manager.

With Shabbs we know that he is less active, and we are thankfull if he still helps out when necessary.

Please accept my apologies. I have checked back and I read it wrong. Yes you said the thread was not allowed under a rule introduced quite recently before it happened although I really feel that a thread
just requesting Mad to listen to 11 out of the then 14 moderation staff who had signed it would have been treated with a bit more respect especially as we had taken the pm route many times. Anyway its in the past and as I predicted at the time many, many staff would leave and for the reasons I stated.

What I am trying to say is that policies are inconsistent and people get upset if they see one member of staff being treated more favourably than another. Some people get fired for inactivity after 2 weeks. Some people get fired for one mistake. Other people seem to make very many mistakes and are kept on. I would not even have bothered to mention this except that the FM still seems to tell people that I seriously abused my powers and firing was a must which is a complete exageration of the situation. If I had banned people for fun, banned people out of spite, deleted posts and threads I could understand it.

I even suggested to him,recently, that we have a pact not to talk about each other to anybody in the future but needless to say he did not find me worthy of a reply but as he said when I was fired he did not find me worthy sending a pm of the reasons I was fired or indeed that a girl was not capable of helping to run the forum. Ce la vie

[Nixt]

I don't see the relation between Shabbs and you though. As Mad explained we decided to keep Shabbs on so he could still help out when necessary. It shouldn't put any extra strain on the other news managers, as besides Shabbs there should be an active manager and assistant manager. Shabbs is only for backup so to speak. Of course if he also is not active anymore to help as backup it will be time for him to leave, but there is no urgency.

Going against your own manager and in that way abusing your powers seems something completely different to me. I don't remember if I said the thread was allowed, but in any case a staff member shouldn't put back a thread that was just removed by his/her manager.

With Shabbs we know that he is less active, and we are thankfull if he still helps out when necessary.

Less active is a little bit of an understatement? There is no way you can say he is there for backup when he doesn't come on! Lets say Adzeh and PrtScrn go away on holiday at the same time - you PM Shabbs asking for him to cover them while they're away. Great. Sorted.

But wait! He hasn't been online in 3 months, he's not going to get that PM?! If you have an alternative contact for him, then fine and I am wrong. If you don't, this is ridiculous.