CS to replace T as Super value basis?

[Immenseman]

The ione Gifts thread wasn't controversial, it showed what everyone thought and sierk ignored it.

Yeah the majority of people thought it should have been changed and technically it is classed as a super rare if you use the habbox definition of a super rare but he didn't see the need to change it. Anyway, back to the topic. Would it work if we had both or would this present us with the same problem we currently face?

[-:Undertaker:-]

Yeah the majority of people thought it should have been changed and technically it is classed as a super rare if you use the habbox definition of a super rare but he didn't see the need to change it. Anyway, back to the topic. Would it work if we had both or would this present us with the same problem we currently face?

I actually tried to do that when I was Manager, 8Freak8 made a new tab where supers could be in Club Sofas and Thrones, but it looked scruffy so I didn't use it and I don't think it should be used now because it honestly looks scruffy and it will present us with the same problem of Throne movement in value.

[Immenseman]

Yeah but then there's the point Elkaa put across that supers will be traded in thrones as that's so much easier rather then putting hundreds of hcs in the trade box. I know people can work it out but then it's a lot easier for super traders to have them in thrones.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Yes but the values will stay innacurate and will change all the time, as long as you are prepared to update every single value working out how many Club Sofas need taking off 15T Purple Dragon and changing them everynight then be my guest, but it's much simpler in Club Sofas.

[Immenseman]

I like the images in your sig. Anyway, we'll wait to see what the verdict is when the poll cloeses, so far a lot more people would prefer us to use Club Sofas so it's looking likely that's what will happen.

[Ashley]

I think that this idea will be good for a while but as Thrones become more popular your new system will deteriorate and end up like it is now, with arguements happening because of values a few times a week.

[Flamedragon3]

I think we should do both to be honest because;

Supers in CS - Most people would rather have this since throne keeps changing in value.

Supers in T - Like Elkaa has pointed out, people trade supers for thrones.

Supers in CS/T - Like Corey said, it would be easier to use both and I think we should use this method.


But it may look a bit of a mess having them both values together, but there are 2 possible ways of sorting this out.

Either have the picture like normal, but with both CS/T values below. Or seperate it in two sections. One in CS the other in T.

[Smiddy]

If I remember rightly from my time as RVR manager.. there's a setting which lets you decide to change the currency from T to C or to T & CS.

Why not just use that? Or is that only on the Normal Rare Values?
Because if that's as I remember (and I'm super tired here so don't shoot me if wrong) - then if there is a value say a fair bit above the price of a T (IE - 20T) you can keep that in that format, or if it's under the price of a throne, or near the price of a throne, you use T & CS / CS?

[Kardan]

Nope, this happened when the Throne dropped to 3HC in October 2005, certain rares were like 980HC.

[Flamedragon3]

If your right Smiddy, then that will be very useful.

But the problem about them both being on is, if the throne changes in value, is there a system which can change the value in CS to the same as throne?

e.g. Dino Egg - 2T 6CS/96CS and the throne is 45CS

and if the throne changes to say 42CS, then the value needs to change to;

Dino Egg - 2T/84CS

If there isn't a system (which I don't think exist's) to sort this out, then Jamie, Jake and Jord have a lot of work to change all the values then.


Wouldn't it be simple for Throne to stay at a certain value lol



*The above values are not all real*