Should staff be fired because they were hacked on msn ?

[Agesilaus]

Well, my personal opinion on this is no, I don't think staff should be fired just because they get 'hacked' on MSN or anywhere for that matter unless it's continuous. To be fair, the user should have all of his access blocked on the site as they are compromised and before giving access back they should be 100% verified that they are the rightful owner of the accounts and confirm they are secure. However, I do understand why they would fire you, I just don't agree with the idea, but I agree it could have been taken up in private.

Now just to make clear of a few things about me that some users didn't appreciate the last time I disagreed with an idea - I'm just sharing my opinion and my ideas. The way Habbox runs their site is up to them and I do respect that. I'm not going against any member of management (in this case who sacked you), that isn't the point I'm making. So before you critisise, put words in my mouth, attempt to change my opinion or go against me because of what I've said, please make sure you understand what I'm saying.

[bo$$]

I think its a pretty obvious implication. Why would he make a thread if he thought he was fairly fired?

Just because he thinks he was unfairly fired, doesn't mean he wants the job back.

He made this thread asking a question.

[Smits]

I think that he wasn't able to keep his pc and details safe and therefore put the site at risk, actions have to be taken.

[Sammeth.]

Just because he thinks he was unfairly fired, doesn't mean he wants the job back.

He made this thread asking a question.

And I said I thought it was an implication. Im pretty sure opinions are allowed to be voiced!

[scott]

ok this thread can be closed
Please read official leaving thread at :-
http://habboxforum.com/showthread.ph...29#post4154229

[bo$$]

And I said I thought it was an implication. Im pretty sure opinions are allowed to be voiced!

I know. You're not the only one who has said it though. If opinions are really allowed to be voiced, then some people should let him think he was banned unfairly and not complain about this thread.

[Sammeth.]

I know. You're not the only one who has said it though. If opinions are really allowed to be voiced, then some people should let him think he was banned unfairly and not complain about this thread.

Indeed, and I have not once said you or anyone else shouldnt voice a different opinion, whilst voicing my own opinion, that, as you have even said yourself, other people share. !

Edit: There is too many commas in that sentence !

[Kardan]

James i am still waiting for reply to your Pm which i sent you. This was just a thread to see what people think about this. And if someone asks you where you are from never mind sum1 that is supposed to be working with you in the same team then yes you would tell them. And to what you said in the room your answer to the security question should be random. The security question is ther for if you forget your password. If you have forgot your password what is the chance that you would remember a random answer you put to the security question. As i also said we are waiting for the person who decided to hack us. We got there ip address and are currently waiting for forum admin to see if this person is a member on the forum. So yea if you would like to do it in the public eye then that is fine by me. As i also said in the pm that i have the backing of a lot of staff that this should not have been taken as far as firing the staff but to give them a warning.

Scotty !

We all think the same as James, you deserved to be fired.

[bo$$]

Indeed, and I have not once said you or anyone else shouldnt voice a different opinion, whilst voicing my own opinion, that, as you have even said yourself, other people share. !

Edit: There is too many commas in that sentence !

and I have not once said that you have said that me or anyone else can't voice a different opinion

Good we have an understanding.
I think this thread can be closed now

[nvrspk4]

I'm not going to bother going into debate on this because there really isn't a debate on this, unless you spin the facts a certain way and omit certain things. However I will say this.

First of all, its a great way to make your case by publically creating a scene.

Second of all, it doesn't matter what everyone thinks, as dictatorial as that may sound. Firings are not done by consensus However in this case we did have the consensus of General Management.

If you voluntarily give away information and don't even make attempts to secure accounts until you are reminded, you become a security threat to Habbox.