In regards to this new banning thing.

[JoeyK.]

So your saying that because I think HABBOS.NET is much better than HabboxForum and I'm advertising it (Click here to go to Habbos.net it's better!) then I'm no longer welcome at HabboxForum and will be banned... God I'm speechless you could make such a silly rule. Mind you I suppose you want me to be speechless if I'm advertising a certain HABBOS.NET which is better than HabboxForum?

No, it's people who spam about other sites repeatedly in random sections that they have a problem with. You're quite within your own rights to have your own opinion, it's just the constant spam that's an issue.

[GommeInc]

'In your opinion.' you have to add to your post. It may well be better in a neutral argument, but for the moment it has to stay your opinion. And that is why this advertising rule is a bit stupid, because your opinion is that Habbos.net is better than HabboxForum, but you're not allowed such an opinion. But I suppose this argument is really over people who spam the forum without showing any liking to Habbox Forum, which shows having membership is invalid.

[Jordy]

In your opinion you have to add to your post. It may well be better in a neutral argument, but for the moment it has to stay your opinion. And that is why this advertising rule is a bit stupid, because your opinion is that Habbos.net is better than HabboxForum, but you're not allowed such an opinion. But I suppose this argument is really over people who spam the forum without showing any liking to Habbox Forum.

It doesn't say 'Constantly' anywhere though, in regards to that section of his post.

[GommeInc]

MAD's, sierk's or Habbos.net fan?

[JoeyK.]

Again, it's directed twards those who repeatedly and constantly spam the boards with such things.

However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum, etcetera.

[Jordy]

MAD's, sierk's or Habbos.net fan?

MADs.

Again, it's directed twards those who repeatedly and constantly spam the boards with such things.

Indeed it does say that, but not in this section of his post which in theory states we can't advertise another forum if we prefer it to HabboxForum.

Some users were here solely to complain and never used the forum for what it offers. The same users also used to promote their own forum saying its better than Habbox etc

There is absolutely no mention of 'Constantly' or 'Repeatedly'

[JoeyK.]

MADs.

Indeed it does say that, but not in this section of his post which in theory states we can't advertise another forum if we prefer it to HabboxForum.

There is absolutely no mention of 'Constantly' or 'Repeatedly'

Which part of the post is that?

[GommeInc]

Then you can, by all means, spam the forum with withever forum you wish, constantly I wonder if they fixed the rule which doesn't state nude images aren't to be uploaded...

[-:Undertaker:-]

its just management trying to make the forum better for everyone. if you dont advertise your forum daying its better than hxf all the time then you wont get banned. its just polite not to continuously brag about another forum

if you dislike the managfement then leave

I have probably contributed more to Habbox than some of Management ever will do in the means of common sence, I will not leave because Management decide to push in idiotic rules.

Again, it's directed twards those who repeatedly and constantly spam the boards with such things.

Then why did Management bring up the same rule? A lot of the time people on this forum have to repeat themselves because their threads are closed/moved.

[Catzsy]

The only query I have with the GM's post is:

If we feel a member is here for those reasons, he/she will be banned.

Will the person just be banned or will there be any sort of pm warning to say this is the feeling of the management and give the person the opportunity to reply before taking such drastic action?