omg mods read

[-Xiangu-]

i see where your coming from but i still stand by my opinion

[--ss--]

I'm pointing out this isn't hentai and most cartoon porn is hentai/anime

my point is this image isn't porn at all.

Pornography sometimes shortened to porn or porno, is the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal. It is similar to, but distinct from erotica, which is the use of sexually arousing imagery used for artistic purposes only. - definition from google

The image shows no sexual activity as they are both fully clothed

It may not be porn but it is still inappropriate.
There is soo much irony in this thread, I bet if we had left the image half the people who posted here would complain that we left the image , you guys just try make a big deal out of every small thing and blame it on staff :/

[The Professor]

To be honest I've seen kids of 11 swearing at people driving cars and throwing stones at me.

11 year olds aren't some precious god given gift from above. They aren't like little children. They are nearly at puberty, if not already beginning the first steps.

Don't let the minority make you generalise about the majority. I do voluntary work at a primary school in an area that isn't exactly too pleasant, and almost all of the kids are your typical 11 year olds who like action men and barbies. I know when I was in year 6 there were only a couple of 11 year olds involved in that "scene" out of around 70.

I don't think its responsible as a forum aimed at young-mid teens to allow these sorts of suggestive images. But obviously I'm in the minority.

[Dan2nd]

Yes as I said above I disagree the avatar in question is as bad as that

[Catzsy]

I'm pointing out this isn't hentai and most cartoon porn is hentai/anime

my point is this image isn't porn at all.

Pornography sometimes shortened to porn or porno, is the explicit representation of the human body or sexual activity with the goal of sexual arousal. It is similar to, but distinct from erotica, which is the use of sexually arousing imagery used for artistic purposes only. - definition from google

the image shows no sexual activity as they are both fully clothed

Sorry pornography has got nothing to do with whether people have clothes on or off. I prefer the Oxford Dictionary definition, myself. Implied sexual activity/innuendo such as this image is not suitable for children. I did not say that it was porn - I said that these images could lead onto cartoon porn.

Why I have got on my soap box is because a lot of you just think its funny without thinking there is any valid reason why it shouldn't be allowed.

I am just asking you think about the subject a bit deeper and see why they are not allowed.

[-Xiangu-]

It may not be porn but it is still inappropriate.
There is soo much irony in this thread, I bet if we had left the image half the people who posted here would complain that we left the image , you guys just try make a big deal out of every small thing and blame it on staff :/

excuse me? I'm not trying to make a big deal. Im voicing my opinion.

and I am staff and this is the only debate I've gotton into in a while and I have the utmost respect for staff as well as ordinary members

[Jamesy]

It may not be porn but it is still inappropriate.
There is soo much irony in this thread, I bet if we had left the image half the people who posted here would complain that we left the image , you guys just try make a big deal out of every small thing and blame it on staff :/

I never once blamed the staff. I quite often go AGAINST the bandwagon and stand up for the staff.

We are not talking about 'Hentai' - I give up. There are cases in the criminal courts everyday producing cartoon porn as evidence of grooming. Quite honestly if nobody can see what implications these types of things can have why should I bother. As I said before the moderation department were correct IMHO. Hollywood you post without thinking what on earth you are saying. The innuendo could mean either that's why its considered inappropriate. I have taken the subject too far as far as you are concerned :S Should I care about this?

No, you shouldn't care. It wasn't porn, I've seen it on other forums. It was a fully dressed mario and peaches. For all you know, She was choking on a peice of bread and he performed the Heimlich manouvre which gave him a level up.

Porn is images that directly show body parts such as breasts, between the legs, etc. when nude. This was not nude, so therefore not a pornographical image. Habbox has to be the ONLY forum to remove this, as I saw it on about 5 that I reguarly use, and it's still there.

So please, let this crap drop, and allow the use of it?
Is that something in the Mod/Manager application form:
"Do you have no sense of humour: (yes)|no"
"Well done you have no humour, lets make him a mod.

Seriously it was a JOKE! Learn to laugh a little?

EDITS:

Implied sexual activity/innuendo such as this image is not suitable for children. I did not say that it was porn - I said that these images could lead onto cartoon porn.

We aren't children, we are mostly teenagers. Unless you are a child? I think not. It's a single image, it wont lead to porn. Stop trying to sound intelligent, It isn't working.

[Falcon]

back to day care now.

back to day care now.

The moderators should go back there.