REPUTATION = Perfect solution.

[warezkid3]

You can reply in your own thread, just to note

[Mexel]

That's what this hack enables you to do.

Install it lol!

Dont see why they shouldn't install it, im sure everyone would like to see it?

[nvrspk4]

I'm not even going to bother going into the insecurity of unecessary hacks, I'll just say this:

You do realize, that if we created a position specifically for a Rep Checker (what did you call it?) then they would also have the task of scouring the reps of members for pointless +reps as well.

Do you really want that?

[e5]

It would be alot easier if employer's didn't trust the person with ADMIN CP

[nvrspk4]

It would be alot easier if employer's didn't trust the person with ADMIN CP

I am completely confused. Say what homesloice?

[Jin]

Well thats a bit unfair then don't you think? That's like pelting a man with an asbo with tomatoes. Surely the asbo was the penalty and he paid the price.

I don't know but the thought of pelting a person with tomatoes sure is entertaining.

I would also be concerned about any members being able to indefinitely edit the reputation they have given, simply because harsh words could be exchanged and before an administrator can ban the user the message may be edited meaning we have no evidence.

If this were to be implemented it would be more than likely for our super moderators than anyone else. However, I don't understand whats wrong with our current system of posting in a thread and Nick- editing it?

[le harry]

I am completely confused. Say what homesloice?

omg its spelt homeslice u n00b!! :@:@:@

I think I translate it to be.. "It'd be a lot easier if management trusted more people with AdminCP", however that does sound.. ridiculous I guess since it's not something you can just throw around.

I dunno.

[execution]

Hope its used, tis really good find and works greata.

[Cixso]

You do realize, that if we created a position specifically for a Rep Checker (what did you call it?) then they would also have the task of scouring the reps of members for pointless +reps as well.

Do you really want that?

Sure. Doesn't bother me about the +reps. It's only fair anyway.

I don't know but the thought of pelting a person with tomatoes sure is entertaining.

I would also be concerned about any members being able to indefinitely edit the reputation they have given, simply because harsh words could be exchanged and before an administrator can ban the user the message may be edited meaning we have no evidence.

You can set permissions for this, so users may not edit there own. You can set it for say Reputation Editors to just do this. It will save a lot of time respectful to Nick.

If this were to be implemented it would be more than likely for our super moderators than anyone else. However, I don't understand whats wrong with our current system of posting in a thread and Nick- editing it?

Saves time, and saves pressure off nick too. Plus you can have more people helping out HabboxForum.

But it is not just about the editing though, it's about us members viewing our archive.

It takes 2 seconds to install. Nothing needs to be edited and I'll show you a demo if you wish on my own forum? So you can view the admin side of it and user side.

[joshuar]

By the screenshots I thought it came with 3.7.0, I thought vBulletin had finally done something cool. Clearly I was wrong

We have had a lot of bad experiences with hacks before, so we tend not to install them just so that the forum stays safe. Besides, Nick- does a fantastic job at doing reputation so I don't think there is any need for more Reputation Editors.

It is a good idea, but it's something I don't see happening because of the risks with hacks.