ALL FLIGHT SIMULATOR DISCUSSIONS IN HERE

[Adam!]

I have

AMD 64 X2 2.51ghz duel core processor
2gb Ram
512mb nVidia 8600GT

And tbh FSX runs total rubbish, yes 20fps or so.. But once you turn the settings up, although you do get 20fps it crashes and stuff.

So yeahh, FS9 ftw.

[iAdam]

All FSX has got is better graphics I believe the physics engines are the same or near enough.

FS9 would run better and I'd go with that so you could have the settings on full and just get a few scenery addons.

[bo$$]

Shut up. If you looked through this whole forum you see him and Danny saying FS9 (FS2004) is some war and some limited edition version when it isn't.

I believe you should take your own advice there, chap. No one was asking for some REMOVED to come storming in trying to prove a point. I know what Danny does, I know what United does, and unlike you - I DONT CARE. I don't cry over one or two people posting something. If they are really so bad then put them on the ignore list crap.

Edited by REDNECK (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not avoid the forum language filter.

[Judge Judy]

Well done Matt

[Recursion]

The Physics engines are FAR better actually

I love my FSX, on absolute full settings with good AA

Q6600 @ 2.4GHz
4GB DDR2 RAM
8800GT 512Mb
19".... oh forget it see my sig.

[Dan!]

lol way to put me down dan

and GRP means Globe Rating policy because tbh it just lookweird you mentoring an S1


then again it pus for mentor like me cuz i get to mentor appoach in time when i canbe assed

[lew!]

GET OUT OF MY THREAD IF YOUR GOING TO ARGUE.
Your as bad as him.

And no decent replies yet.

[Dan!]

FSX is better verison of fs9 (2004) with lot of updates which user request over time its ok i guess it dose need lot to run well tbh fs2004 dose everything that fsx dose

[lew!]

Ok, So examples of new features etc?

[efq]

600/700 NG.



737-800/900 NG.


747-400.

Thanks! See people are nice. Ill rep+ if possible.