Oh dear, this has been one active thread.
I must admit they look quite similar, indeed. Firstly the backgrounds are the same. The colours of the two layouts are similar yes but not the exact same. The placing of the sub boxes are the same as well. Notice how Navigation is first, followed by DJ of the week and a radio player. Each website has a photo looking banner at the top too. The main content box starts off by saying, "Welcome to sitename," on both websites, furthermore beside that is a similar box. The title of each page is Sitename >> slogan. The same font size was used, as well as style, on the navigation, which uses the same style of buttons. Each site contains a tick tack toe game (which are the same) and a love calculator under community. The background page under community has the exact same backgrounds. Probably more similar things are here too. Both websites use frame navigation.
On the source code side, they were sliced differently, however both sites start off with this code,
[html]<script type="text/javascript">
var preloaded = new Array();
function preloadImages() {
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++){
preloaded[i] = document.createElement('img');
preloaded[i].setAttribute('src',arguments[i]);
};
};
preloadImages(
'images/advertisements/newhc.gif',
'images/advertisements/habbcrazyhomes.gif'
);
var links = new Array(
'cutenews/show_news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1205624895&tem plate=updates',
'cutenews/show_news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1205624895&tem plate=updates'
);
var text = new Array(
'Welcome to the New Version of HabbCrazy.NET!',
'HabbCrazy Homes - Coming <b>Monday 17th March</b>!'
);
var curOffset = 1;
window.onload=function() {
document.getElementById('randLink').href = links[0];
document.getElementById('randImage').src = preloaded[0].src;
document.getElementById('randText').innerHTML = text[0];
setInterval(
function() {
document.getElementById('randLink').href = links[curOffset];
document.getElementById('randImage').src = preloaded[curOffset].src;
document.getElementById('randText').innerHTML = text[curOffset];
curOffset = (curOffset >= preloaded.length-1) ? 0 : curOffset + 1;
}, 10000);
};
</script>
The documentation of both website's source is the same sort of stye, it's very organized.
I'm not a fan off any of these websites, in-fact this was the first time I've been on CH's website in a while now, as for HabboCrazy I remember a website called that from 2003, I'm not sure if they're the same. Anyhow, I wouldn't be able to guess who copied who, or if this is just generic information and standards every fan site follows. If Habbo Crazy copied Club Habbo, they did do a better job on the layout, but that doesn't make it right.HTML Code:<!-- Example -->
On a side-note, Microsoft copied many ideas from other companies, (such as Apple) and with much of the copied material, made improvements. Does it make it right? I don't think so, and the courts will resolve the Microsoft issues in time, though with over 60 legal cases it will take a long time to unravel. I don't know who copied who with Habbo Crazy, but if they did copy Club Habbo it was wrong, but improvements were made to the layout if so.
That's just my $00.02!
















