The New Moderation Changes.

[Nixt]

Moderation is mostly all about judgement

Then why, oh why, are you introducing the use of automatic bans?!

I'm in full support of this new system. If you are complaining that you don't get a PM with a warning when you do something wrong, my suggestion is that you take a look through the forum rules to make sure you don't get one in the first place.

Why do you hold that opinion? Why do you think that individuals should not receive a PM? Please explain your way of thinking.
It seems so stupid that people don't get a PM after receiving a warning and I just really cannot see why you would remove it? If someone can justify the reason I will sit back and say okay, great, good idea. I was wrong, you are right - but as of yet I do not see any justification for it.

[IRBlueMoon]

it's okay i guess. i've never really had over 4 active infractions/warnings at one point i don't think so i'm not bothered.

Looks I need to calm down a bit then. I think I had 8 infractions and 6 warnings... I might just ask Alex to post my information like he did last time which he shouldn't have done. :rolleyes:

This is a sign that you all should be less naughty now.

Rich coming from you?

BUT WHAT IF PEOPLE ALREADY HAVE LIKE 15 INFRACTIONS OR SOMETHING? WILL THEY GET BANNED OR WHAT?

They'd be banned already.

[@xP]

I'm in full support of this new system. If you are complaining that you don't get a PM with a warning when you do something wrong, my suggestion is that you take a look through the forum rules to make sure you don't get one in the first place.

Rich coming from you.

If you wern't a moderator you would 100% against this as your the forum
'spammer' and wont want to be prevented to gaining your 1000 posts day achievment.

I'm against this. What was wrong with the old moderation system?

[Slowpoke]

i think it's great ;D

[jesus]

BUT WHAT IF PEOPLE ALREADY HAVE LIKE 15 INFRACTIONS OR SOMETHING? WILL THEY GET BANNED OR WHAT?

Stop talking in capitals. If they had 15 active infractions then yes they would. But they should be banned already.

No they wouldn't. The auto-bans start in 3 weeks so that gives time for existing infractions or warnings to expire.

Then why, oh why, are you introducing the use of automatic bans?!



Why do you hold that opinion? Why do you think that individuals should not receive a PM? Please explain your way of thinking.
It seems so stupid that people don't get a PM after receiving a warning and I just really cannot see why you would remove it? If someone can justify the reason I will sit back and say okay, great, good idea. I was wrong, you are right - but as of yet I do not see any justification for it.

I was agreeing with the auto-ban ideology. I just made a suggestion for those complaining about not receiving PMs.

Rich coming from you?

Rich coming from you.

If you wern't a moderator you would 100% against this as your the forum
'spammer' and wont want to be prevented to gaining your 1000 posts day achievment.

I'm against this. What was wrong with the old moderation system?

The highest amount of infractions I've had at one time is 2 with 4 warnings. :S

i think it's great ;D

Good. Everyone else seems to be against everything that the forum ever does... until it's them who are being bullied or whatever. :eusa_booh

[Slowpoke]

Good. Everyone else seems to be against everything that the forum ever does... until it's them who are being bullied or whatever. :eusa_booh

They will never be happy - whatever management do. You know what I mean...

[Nixt]

I was agreeing with the auto-ban ideology. I just made a suggestion for those complaining about not receiving PMs.
The highest amount of infractions I've had at one time is 2 with 4 warnings. :S

Good. Everyone else seems to be against everything that the forum ever does... until it's them who are being bullied or whatever. :eusa_booh

So do you agree with the lack of warning PMs, or not? Why do you think automatic bans are a good idea? I dislike posts where people do not back up their statements, it makes them seem like they are following others blindly.
I am disagreeing because my opinion happens to go against the implementation of new systems. Not because I have anything against management. In a recent conversation with MAD I told him I thought, on the whole, Habbox were doing fine but occasionally decisions were made that, to me, seem stupid. This decision happens to be one of them.

[@xP]

No they wouldn't. The auto-bans start in 3 weeks so that gives time for existing infractions or warnings to expire.

I was agreeing with the auto-ban ideology. I just made a suggestion for those complaining about not receiving PMs.



The highest amount of infractions I've had at one time is 2 with 4 warnings. :S

Good. Everyone else seems to be against everything that the forum ever does... until it's them who are being bullied or whatever. :eusa_booh

We didn't talk about infractions.

I'm talking about your constant rule breaking.
The spam etc.

But i guess your dong your job now telling people to read the forum rules.
All im trying to say is you spam all over the forum.


And there still no specific reason to why the old system went and the new system is coming in. :rolleyes:

[Slowpoke]

We didn't talk about infractions.

I'm talking about your constant rule breaking.
The spam etc.

But i guess your dong your job now telling people to read the forum rules.
All im trying to say is you spam all over the forum.


And there still no specific reason to why the old system went and the new system is coming in. :rolleyes:

Sorry Corey but he doesn't spam. There is no rule against making lots of posts in one day. All of Jamie's posts contribute to the topic at hand so all his posts are justified. Spam is if someone went around posting, "LOL" - "YEH" etc. Jamies posts are lengthy and as I said, he's always contributing.

[Neversoft]

Automatic bans = big thumbs down from me. I don't like them simply because I think there needs to be an intelligent and human input when it comes to banning members which you do not get from automatic bans. As I've said before, changing a system that is fine already can often cause problems. Why try and fix something that isn't broken?!

I totally agree.

Also, what if you get a handful of unfair warnings/infractions and get banned/cautioned? You'll have to go through a ton of trouble to get unbanned/uncautioned when it won't be your fault in the first place. It takes atleast 5 days for them to unban you these days... Thats very unfair and I can see it happening a lot.

I think 5 warnings for a caution is too less... You could get like 4 warnings all on the same day and then not get any until 2 months later, but get cautioned for it. It was a lot better before where how often you broke the rules determined whether you got cautioned/banned or not. As Garion said already, you need human input, not some computer.