Moderation Changes Cont.

[today]

Does anyone want to respondto my input asked a few posts aboved

Yes i did see that and i await to see the outcome for that actually

what are the rules we can get banned for now?

Dont rule break and you wont have to find out. :rolleyes:

[Nixt]

I'm getting cautioned in 3 weeks anyway, none of my 5 warnings will be cleared by then.
It really pisses me off that I have 5/0 (0) and yet people could be with 4/4 (4) and they dont get cautioned.

I don't think Super Moderators will give up banning people altogether, and rely on automatic banning. People with 4/4 will probably be punished as well as those who get the automatic ban with 5/0.

[PaulMacC]

no, no, no.
I am talking about warnings.

[Emdla]

The point I am trying to make is why is it that people with 5 warnings get cautioned while people with 4 warnings and 4 infractions dont. Im losing my VIP features which I payed for if I get cautioned yet these people who are doing worse than me dont.

I feel 4 u

Edited by jesus (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not post pointlessly.

[Slowpoke]

I don't think Super Moderators will give up banning people altogether, and rely on automatic banning. People with 4/4 will probably be punished as well as those who get the automatic ban with 5/0.

Of course. For exmaple, people who come to cause trouble will be banned instantly, people who are IP/auto banned will be banned instantly and finally bots will be banned instantly.

[today]

I don't think Super Moderators will give up banning people altogether, and rely on automatic banning. People with 4/4 will probably be punished as well as those who get the automatic ban with 5/0.

Hopefully.

no, no, no.
I am talking about warnings.

I belive if you have 4 warnings and infractions (as a example) then you'll be overlooked very often and to get the 4 infractions you must be very close ot being banned anyway, though i would like an admin to see your post ;]

EDIT:
I think even if you have say 5 warnings now, and 3 weeks later you still have 5 but no more then you'll not get cautioend till you gain another one.?

[PaulMacC]

What am I saying is, I think it's unfair with people who's warnings and infractions dont expire in the amount of time Elkaa has given us. We will be punished under the new system which isnt really fair since half of my warnings are silly tbh.

[Nixt]

Finally!

The whole point of this change was to give less infractions out, its sometihng like 4/10 rules which require infractions now, the rest can be given as warnings ONLY.

So your pretty much never going to get banned unless you enjoy breaking rules. ;')

If less Infractions are being given out, to me, it seems that there is even less need for automatic bans. I can now (FINALLY) see why they have been introduced but that doesn't change my opinion on the need for human input.

[Slowpoke]

What am I saying is, I think it's unfair with people who's warnings and infractions dont expire in the amount of time Elkaa has given us. We will be punished under the new system which isnt really fair since half of my warnings are silly tbh.

i think staff will be dealt with differently since you aren't dealt with by the (S)Mod team, you're dealt with by Nick- and Nvrspk4. I suggest you PM Elkaa about this.

[PaulMacC]

What about cautions?
I dont want to be setting a bad example to the rest of the forum as a staff member being cautioned.
They need to wise up with whats a warning and whats not.
You know the double posting rule should be demolished because someone makes a mistake and they get punished for it.