this forum is called discuss anything..

[bo$$]

I think more than that we've been moving towards creating something for *everything* to have a section which has slowly restricted the number of "Discuss Anything" type topics. With all the requests for a new sub-forum because there wasn't one to cover it, Discuss Anything became less useful. However, maybe we could merge the unpopular and unused forums back into Discuss Anything?

And maybe rename it Discuss Anything Else if we must

That, my friends, is a good idea.

[e5]

His thread was pretty spam worthy.

"wt u think of nancy"
--
"ye discuss"

The think I would put in Disscuss Anything is things like "What would you do if the world only consisted on 1,000 people and you were one of them."

[Remotive]

His thread was pretty spam worthy.

"wt u think of nancy"
--
"ye discuss"

The think I would put in Disscuss Anything is things like "What would you do if the world only consisted on 1,000 people and you were one of them."

I agree. You would at least type a bit civilized to show that you're not in the spam section.

[GoldenMerc]

Shoulnt it be called General Discusion?

[GommeInc]

Or actually go by what spam means and not re-write a definition for it to suit HxF :rolleyes: Spam is literally crap and is obviously meant to be crap, stuff that isn't useful.

[Ostinato]

Or actually go by what spam means and not re-write a definition for it to suit HxF :rolleyes: Spam is literally crap and is obviously meant to be crap, stuff that isn't useful.

Great post.

Lol I am surprised how much I have been agreeing with you lately (It's so out of my nature )

[Mrs.McCall]

I recently mentioned the Spam v Discuss Anything idea to Elkaa and it is a toughie but it is up to Mods to move as they see fit.

For example a post in Discuss Anything which says "Davina McCall is fit" would be moved to spam but if you were to create a discussion i.e. "Who thinks Davina McCall is a good presenter?" then it'd be discuss anything.

In my opinion anyway

[GommeInc]

I recently mentioned the Spam v Discuss Anything idea to Elkaa and it is a toughie but it is up to Mods to move as they see fit.

For example a post in Discuss Anything which says "Davina McCall is fit" would be moved to spam but if you were to create a discussion i.e. "Who thinks Davina McCall is a good presenter?" then it'd be discuss anything.

In my opinion anyway

That's not spam... A thread title cannot tell you what is spam and what isn't, it can only suggest. What tells you what threads/posts are and are not spam are the posts and replies made in the thread. A thread can be useful if it had "Davina is FIT," because it is sharing the opinion of another member which is what a forum is about. It is only spam if the post made in the thread is unrelated and incredibly useless to the forum.

[Slowpoke]

That's not spam... A thread title cannot tell you what is spam and what isn't, it can only suggest. What tells you what threads/posts are and are not spam are the posts and replies made in the thread. A thread can be useful if it had "Davina is FIT," because it is sharing the opinion of another member which is what a forum is about. It is only spam if the post made in the thread is unrelated and incredibly useless to the forum.

When I was a moderator in General I would wait for the topic to get a few replys. If they were like "lol" etc then I would move it, even if it was a civilized topic. If there was only one silly reply then they would obviously get a "Do not post pointlessly" edit. Like the other moderators are saying, it's a tricky one but it's down to personal judgment.

[Mr.Sam]

merge unused sections with discuss anything, one being the joke forum - it's hardly used, the only real reason threads are in there because they are moved from discuss anything.