Rule please.

[Simmzay]

Oh right, that's fine then. I misinterepreted the post, I'm sorry. And yeah, I do feel it warrants a permanent ban.

[The Professor]

Oh right, that's fine then. I misinterepreted the post, I'm sorry. And yeah, I do feel it warrants a permanent ban.

Generally on here it'll say "temp ban" if there's a time limit on the ban, and just "banned" if its permanent

[timROGERS]

Seems like a fair ban to me - it is clearly stated in the forum rules that you may not abuse VIP subscription in this (and other) way(s).

[GommeInc]

How comes people think he abused his VIP rights for bad? He only opened his thread again, posted a reply then closed it again. He did bad, but fixed it by closing it again "/ If he left it open then it'll be bad...

[DJ-Ains.T]

Mmm, that's a good rule I like it ;P

[Simmzay]

Gomme, I think the problem is people wanting to get the last word on the thread. If it was more along the lines of correcting yourself or explaining your comments then it's fine. But wanting to have the last word, and in turn "win" the argument, and undo a moderator's changes shouldn't be allowed.

[GommeInc]

Gomme, I think the problem is people wanting to get the last word on the thread. If it was more along the lines of correcting yourself or explaining your comments then it's fine. But wanting to have the last word, and in turn "win" the argument, and undo a moderator's changes shouldn't be allowed.

Surely there's no real difference between that and a pointless closure of a thread? Where a debate / argument is a foot and then the moderator ruins it by closing it, so you can't get your summary of the argument posted. JUst ignore it, it'll sink away anyway within a few hours, or a day. It should of been a warning really, rather than a ban, because evidence from breaking other rules suggests its infractionable / warnable.