How very ironic =/

[nvrspk4]

But as the argument is, they can't be dealt with immediately because they have to wait for a Staff Editor to come online. So no, they aren't dealt with, with more seriousness, because if they were their behavioured would be watched all the time, more so than members which as it is clear, one person who deals with staff vs. however many super mods and moderators to deal with members is kinda clear... Staff aren't dealt with as serious as anyone else.

Right, they can't be dealt with immediately. That doesn't mean that they're not dealt with. Trust me, I know that as soon as a member of staff breaks the rules, a hundred people jump to report it (and you'll have to trust me on this one because I can see the Post Reports, where six people will report the same thing as the person is staff but three posts down they won't have reported the member). Nearly every thing a staff member does is watched, with more vigilance because they get watched over as much as members do, actually more. All the Mods and Super Mods, if they see a staff problem, PM me. So every time they spot it (just as they would for members) it gets dealt with. Members, however, are extremely conscientious about reporting staff - because many members love to see staff get in trouble. So staff get placed under extra scrutiny (in addition to that, they often have the pleasure of being singled out in threads in this forum.) So no, Staff are under much more scrutiny than anyone else.

Moving on to something slightly different. What if a member isn't going rogue but is having 'one of those moments' where they're just fed up with things? That's not being rogue, that's just having a moment of self-inflicted hatred for something. Staff can be rogue aswell as only have short term anger for something. Rogue is just that little bit more serious because it's the final straw if you will, where they decide enough is enough and go on a pointless spamming spree. As we now know, they won't be dealt with immediately because moderators aswell as super moderators cannot touch them, because it breaks the private, moderator rules. Unless this is where rule benind falls into play, which myself and many others are aware of this.

No, it's moved to a forum (as I've explained before) where the public can no longer see it. This way, the post isn't altered (so we have all the proof) but its not harming the public either. Then the member can be dealt with.

Also, is this about that ClubHabbo thing where they pretending to post a link to ClubHabbo but are actually linking to Habbox because theyve found out how to play with [url] tags?

Yeah kind of Our staff are easily amused you see There's also a tad bit of an inside joke involved.

[CHA!NGANG]

Yeah kind of Our staff are easily amused you see There's also a tad bit of an inside joke involved.

I still don't get the joke though

[Decode]

So you got an infraction for saying "suck". Pathetic...

[The Professor]

So you got an infraction for saying "suck". Pathetic...

The infraction is called "insulting other forum members" and "staff suck" is insulting other forum members. I fail to see what's pathetic...

[GommeInc]

Right, they can't be dealt with immediately. That doesn't mean that they're not dealt with. Trust me, I know that as soon as a member of staff breaks the rules, a hundred people jump to report it (and you'll have to trust me on this one because I can see the Post Reports, where six people will report the same thing as the person is staff but three posts down they won't have reported the member). Nearly every thing a staff member does is watched, with more vigilance because they get watched over as much as members do, actually more. All the Mods and Super Mods, if they see a staff problem, PM me. So every time they spot it (just as they would for members) it gets dealt with. Members, however, are extremely conscientious about reporting staff - because many members love to see staff get in trouble. So staff get placed under extra scrutiny (in addition to that, they often have the pleasure of being singled out in threads in this forum.) So no, Staff are under much more scrutiny than anyone else.

So how comes they're not dealt with immediately :rolleyes: Moderators should be able to deal with them because they are just members with different roles in the community. If it means staff will attack other staff, then you remove the staff member who caused the first offense... What happens in the case of a staff member swearing continuously and only a moderator is available, is it left there? What if they swear in a thread created by a member? Does it get removed destroying evidence or edited which does near enough the same thing? Removing the thread surely isn't the option.

No, it's moved to a forum (as I've explained before) where the public can no longer see it. This way, the post isn't altered (so we have all the proof) but its not harming the public either. Then the member can be dealt with.

Makes sense, but what happen with posts in another persons in thread (like asked before)?

Yeah kind of Our staff are easily amused you see There's also a tad bit of an inside joke involved.

Share the joke damn it