LOLLOriginally Posted by Mitch4?
im always on perezhilton lol
Results 41 to 50 of 76
-
-
omggg i LOVE perez! complete legenddd. Originally Posted by Mitch4?
and lmao god i dont see whats so wrong with showing her back?!
-
why does she try and purport herself as some squeaky clean girl next door. shes clearly just as sexually curious and lustful as all the others such as jamie lynn spears.
If you rest, you rust
-
She looks 13 she has no ****.
-
The most polite and respectful thing I can say is she's a little too young.
-
I would.
:eusa_whisi'm out of touch, i'm out of love
i'll pick you up when you're getting down
and out of all these things i've done
i think i love you better now
-
arghh lusty boys on a forum fantasizing about getting it on with a much too young girl.
lovelyIf you rest, you rust
-
Taking into account the fact that the majority of the userbase are 14-15 themselves, it's hardly surprising. Originally Posted by Asher
I pity the poor girl... but that's what you get from public exposure.
Just remembered a relevant article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7364475.stmLast edited by Barmi; 29-04-2008 at 06:37 PM.
-
I don't see what is wrong with the photo.
1. children aren't going to be reading the magazine
2. it has an arty feel to it, it doesn't have a porn look.
3. you would see more if she was on the beach wearing a bikini.(ﾟДﾟ≡ﾟДﾟ)
Roy: [singing] We don't need no education.
Moss: Yes you do; you've just used a double negative
-
Haha it does as well. Originally Posted by Mr.Sam
Softcore at its worst. That sleepover pic has she just done a jog or summit?
Doubt everything, even this.
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts