The New Member Approval

[danandthe3gifts]

True we could have a suspension from these forums then.

Perhaps if someone is posting ridiclulous post's in here they could get a 'Feedback Caution'

A Feedback Caution would just be given to people who post against anything management has implemented. It will be misused, I could only see it working if a seperate department was set up with hardly any links to management was incharge of it.

It's too much hassle for such a small problem.

[samsaBEAR]

Don't fix what isnt broken

agreed. its fine how it is, spam accounts get banned within a couple of days anyway, so there's no point.

[today]

fnx for bumping!!

dont "approve" members please. we ave a right to register when we want so do others!!!1

[GommeInc]

I despise every aspect of this idea, it won't work and is very rude and anti-social. If a member has been perm banned and they make another account, do not for the love of Christ ban them immediately until they actually start doing countless things wrong and become a nuisance. Everyone deserves a second chance, and it makes the management look as if they value their members...

[samsaBEAR]

fnx for bumping!!

dont "approve" members please. we ave a right to register when we want so do others!!!1

aha lol i didnt realise it was an old thread
flyingjesus linked to it from another thread so i assumed it was a new thread

[Corporal]

Hundreds of people join the forum a day and approving them all will be an impossible task
It's fine how it is , if we suspect if anything is wrong/the user is dodgy we can check their ip's and ban them if needed.
It'll be pointless in checking everyone's background information for no reason at all.

proof please?

[samsaBEAR]

proof please?

no need to get stressy, its an old thread that was obviously left to rot, i only accidently bumped it, i dont want this to start into a massive flame war because of me

[Corporal]

no need to get stressy, its an old thread that was obviously left to rot, i only accidently bumped it, i dont want this to start into a massive flame war because of me

im not:s
im just asking for proof. dont use a stastic if you dont have proof.

[samsaBEAR]

im not:s
im just asking for proof. dont use a stastic if you dont have proof.

oh sorry, it just sounded like you were reading to accuse them of lying

[@xP]

It requires too much effort. Are they really going to review every user that signs up?

Thats what i was thinking. It would take a heck of a long time to approve all members that register daily.