Lmao with an F

[Wootzeh]

One of the words that a certain letter represents is filtered and quite a harsh swear word, that's why.

not used in an offensive context though, which is why piss is unfiltered?

[GommeInc]

One of the words that a certain letter represents is filtered and quite a harsh swear word, that's why.

So? It's a common internet term used by children of 10 through their teens and adults, and members joining this forum should be in their teens, and it's not even harsh unless you like the nanny culture type things. Plus the other word for donkey is filtered and lmao and lm*ao has it in! Is ROFFL filtered by the way? Because it translates to "rolling on F word floor laughing."

And as Wootzeh said, it can't be used as an offensive term, which is why piss was unfiltered (strangely not the 4 letter D word which was asked to be unfiltered).

[jesus]

not used in an offensive context though, which is why piss is unfiltered?

The 'f' word is a lot more harsh and unpleasant.

[Paulio]

Well if it wasn't added to the filter until recently, surely it should be removed as it was unfair that I had no previous warning and if it had apeard in stars I would have removed it and replaced it with "lmao" :S

It was not an infraction, it was a warning so it's not as harsh. "*****" is filtered, but in the post you clearly wrote that - not sure how you bypassed it, unless it has been added to the filter recently.

[jesus]

Well if it wasn't added to the filter until recently, surely it should be removed as it was unfair that I had no previous warning and if it had apeard in stars I would have removed it and replaced it with "lmao" :S

It's always been classed as avoiding the filter and always will be, because that's what it is. As is the alternative to 'gtho'.

[e5]

If it's not filtered, as far as we know it's ok. You say Lmao, so if you to make that sound more pronounced and show that you're laughing more, you put an F in. TBH in my books lmao with an f is 'laughing as flipping *** off'.

[Niall!]

I'd like to give some feedback on the rule that doesn't allow us to use "*****" - I've just got an infraction for it which I think is harsh (Don't move this thread to ask forum moderators as I'm givign feedback on what I think).

If we're going to receive an infraction for it, shouldn't it be filtered? It's a term that is used day in, day out on Habbo and with most other teenagers over MSN. Why give people a bad record for saying something most people probz don't even know that thier not allowed to say?

Also, it's great how the second I critisise jesus I start to get infraction coming out my bum. Some of the mods on this forum are starting to get corrupt as hell.

Edit: I've just relised how it's now filtered. If it's filtered, why did I recieve an infraction for it?

I agree, I made a remark about him and two minutes later was warned by him.

[Paulio]

Why asume that it always has? Habbox has been around since 2004. It wasn't then and it has never caused anyone any offence. (That I'm aware of). Infact, I've never come accross anyone that finds it offencive.

It's always been classed as avoiding the filter and always will be, because that's what it is. As is the alternative to 'gtho'.

[GommeInc]

I am interested actually, technically you can't filter an abbreviation because you can change the words. LM*AO could be "Laughing my flipping bottom off."

[Galaxay]

I'd like to give some feedback on the rule that doesn't allow us to use "*****" - I've just got an infraction for it which I think is harsh (Don't move this thread to ask forum moderators as I'm givign feedback on what I think).

If we're going to receive an infraction for it, shouldn't it be filtered? It's a term that is used day in, day out on Habbo and with most other teenagers over MSN. Why give people a bad record for saying something most people probz don't even know that thier not allowed to say?

Also, it's great how the second I critisise jesus I start to get infraction coming out my bum. Some of the mods on this forum are starting to get corrupt as hell.

Edit: I've just relised how it's now filtered. If it's filtered, why did I recieve an infraction for it?

Yeh i asked jesus to remove something then he refused, as i used rules to back up why it should be he had to do it, since then he's gave me an infraction and 2 warnings (within last 3 days?). :rolleyes: