George Sampson wins Britains Got Talent

[buttons]

Why shouldn't he have won?
George was clearly the best performance of the night, and it wasnt a fix he already got the most votes on the semi final he was in for that performance he was amazing.
An I dont see why he'd be so cocky, just 'seeing' him dosn't mean you know him, and espically since he seems abit shy? and so what if he is, he has basically nothing and just loves to dance his personality dosn't mean anything in the comp.
I'm glad the two opera kids didn't win, they didnt deserve it and espically since Faryl was in papers like "I WONT LET FAME GET TO ME!!" like she already won britains got talent. The dog didnt desereve it, its not exactly entertaining and Signature already said they'd performed infront of massive audience's so now its Georges chance.
An if your going on about his 'sob story' please? lmao. Andrew was clearly the biggest sob story "vote me and lets BEAT the bullies!!" if they was going vote the sob he would have won, George just showed you his life he didnt say anything else and he was doing it for his mum not for himself

:eusa_danc

couldn't agree with you anymore really!! People don't win because they "deserve" it, it's a talent show, that's obviously why George won :S no amount of arguing is going to change the decision, it wasn't a fix at all, obviously some of these people here are arguing for the sake of arguing, Faryl in my opinion was not as great as people think, if you actually go watch her, she is not that amazing, just really listen to her, it's like that Escala girls, you think they are fit only because they are a bunch of women. There are so much acts like them already at the Royal Variety, and tbh the only reason I'm going to watch it now is because George won and that's something I actually want to see.

Really, he did the same routine as he did for the semi-finals, he had a few days to rehurse a new routine and not doing so tbh I think he didnt deserve it. The two young opera singers were amazing, signature WERE good and had 5 days to rehurse a new routine and couldnt, escada were brilliant so the last 4 should have been in the top and one of them being winners.

like I said, its not about who deserves it, it's based on the talent and who we want to see at the Royal Variety, they are not "opera singers" they are kids who happen to have good voices, if Faryl was so brilliant why didn't you all pick up your phones and ******* vote?! the two singers have probably sang all these songs before, so they had longer to prepare, unlike George.

[Mr.Sam]

George was actually supposed to perform to "staying alive" by the bee gees but simon advised him to do dancing in the rain again which I think was a really good choice.

also it's escala not escada

Really, he did the same routine as he did for the semi-finals, he had a few days to rehurse a new routine and not doing so tbh I think he didnt deserve it. The two young opera singers were amazing, signature WERE good and had 5 days to rehurse a new routine and couldnt, escada were brilliant so the last 4 should have been in the top and one of them being winners.

[Frodo13.]

There is no good moaning about the result. You should expect him to win because the British public does not vote on talent, they vote on sob stories and production value. George can thank the producers of the programme for coming up with the rainfall gimmick. The reason girls do not come out the victor is because of the fact that the majority of voters are female, hence the reason why acts such as "Strike" advanced as far as they did.

The acts create and make the decisions on every aspect of their routine. George probably said 'I want rainfall'and the producers said 'OK'. George was unique. Farrell and Andrew were just more opera singers, who infact sound all the same to me. And you can see Signature at any cheap entertainment show on a holiday in Benidorm.

[JessicaLOL]

Really, he did the same routine as he did for the semi-finals, he had a few days to rehurse a new routine and not doing so tbh I think he didnt deserve it. The two young opera singers were amazing, signature WERE good and had 5 days to rehurse a new routine and couldnt, escada were brilliant so the last 4 should have been in the top and one of them being winners.

George did prepare a new one but he was advised not to use it.
Clearly because in the semi-final he was in he had got the most votes for that dance so why not do it again and win.
Opera singers win everything and there boring, and if there so brilliant then why did faryl not get into the top 3? .. signature wernt just good they made one of the best performances of the night resulting in them being 2nd, and what you mean had 5 days to make a new routine? there is more stress then anything look at nemsis they was good and all but look closely, the brown girl forgot most of her moves and one of the girls is in hospital (blonde one) under emotional stress and being tired. I would never put myself under that, I would stay with the same routine so lol.

[PaulMacC]

IMO, The guy from Signature who can do all the Michael Jackson moves is a better dancer than George, I dont see how he won.
It's not based on talent, it's about how many people like you on the night.

[Davii]

Apparently George is never allowed to dance again cause he has a rare spine condition.

[PaulMacC]

Apparently George is never allowed to dance again cause he has a rare spine condition.

Where did you hear that?
edit; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2064...ess-fears.html

[Davii]

I saw it on some woman's newspaper while I was in the queue at the garage so looked it up.

[DopeFiend]

Signature were the better performers and would have been more suited to win the competition imo.
Well done to George nevertheless.

[scott]

He deserved to win, he was really good! Although signature where great performers aswell!