
print: 574ms over {216 + … + 21} i
I prefer print.. although you are correct.
Last edited by Independent; 12-06-2008 at 08:24 PM.
- echo: 463ms over {216 + … + 21} iterations
- print: 574ms over {216 + … + 21} iterations
You forgot something hunny x
EDIT: Which also brings me to the point that echo is faster than print as it takes 463 ms to echo out a string of text and it takes 574 for print.
Last edited by Excellent; 12-06-2008 at 08:30 PM.
Knowing that doesn't exactly mean you rule at php, you don't even know the syntax so you will get nowhere until you've learnt it.
I don't think you are in a position to insult people on their php and coding skills. Look at Nivade, if that isn't a bad example of how not to make a site, then I don't know what is.
It bugs me that you are so cocky about everything, yet you can't do things overly correctly yourself. Also bugs me you banned my account on nivade because I told you about a possible security flaw, and yet I did nothing. Well done.
I don't know syntax when yours didn't work? right okay christopher columbus. In my defense I was simply following what tom said as I know absolutely jack shack about cutenews.
In which I realized my syntax was wrong after you pointed it out, I have now added the slashes. But you cannot say because I miss-used syntax that I am rubbish at PHP when, 1. As matt kindly said you are in no place to talk due to your usersystem like "social network" and your coding not working/susceptible to injections.
It was a typo in the function, and I was looking for the most secure function - but I have patched it with a better method.In which I realized my syntax was wrong after you pointed it out, I have now added the slashes. But you cannot say because I miss-used syntax that I am rubbish at PHP when, 1. As matt kindly said you are in no place to talk due to your usersystem like "social network" and your coding not working/susceptible to injections.
+ "Matt"; Why are you even posting - You was sucking up to me in the other thread, so go away please, thanks.
Not posting in this thread anymore, as the creator of this thread is a complete noob.
Yeah.. typo in full functions.. Matt was posting to save a bunch of others doing it, you're as much of a noob at php as I am, we both make mistakes but you seem to think you rule over the rest. Please stay away from these forums if you thinkyou can rule the roost.It was a typo in the function, and I was looking for the most secure function - but I have patched it with a better method.
+ "Matt"; Why are you even posting - You was sucking up to me in the other thread, so go away please, thanks.
Not posting in this thread anymore, as the creator of this thread is a complete noob.
EXCUSE ME SIR
"You was sucking up to me in the other thread, so go away please, thanks. "
I would love a link to where I was sucking up, giving constructive criticism yes, but sucking up to someone that calls another person a noob... no. Plus why would I suck up to a c-grade php programmer when I run a respectful design studio in Guildford... Also during this advice I was giving you, you banned me for apparently trying to compromise the security of the site... when I said you should check it.
If we are using this immature language then in fact you are a 'noob' for even going anywhere near this pathetic word for an insult.
Now then it's about time you grow up minor, I can't believe people trust you with there details on an SNS.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!