The Spoilers Rule

[The Professor]

But I seen spoilers being added for a programme that has already be on tv.

In which case that's wrong. I've spoken to Coldplay about this so hopefully there should be less "pointless" spoiler additions

[msb.]

In which case that's wrong. I've spoken to Coldplay about this so hopefully there should be less "pointless" spoiler additions

Okay thanks no worries, we all make mistakes I suppose.

[GearsOfWar]

It's the dumbest rule on this forum. The lost thread states in the title that there will be spoilers so if you don't want Lost spoilt don't read the thread, correct? And then when you post without spoilers you get Coldplay using his authorities against you. :rolleyes:

[-Eyeless-]

Hey

I was wondering what the rule is on using Spoiler Tags. I got a PM for telling people Alex got ejected from BB and not putting it in Spoilers. Is it possible to ruin Big Brother for someone? I understand if it was the finale of lost I was talking about but it was Big Brother. So I'm wondering how far this rule goes. Also if you don't use them can you be infracted?

Thanks

Andy

In answer to your question about BB I would say that it is just as important to use spoilers both in a thread title and in posts if it is concerning things that have not been shown in the BB last 24 hour catch up programs. This is because not everybody watches it live or looks on the site for updates and like to watch the program to find out answers rather than have people tell them. Thats my two cents

[Tristan]

Okay thanks no worries, we all make mistakes I suppose.

But he makes too many.