Grand Theft Auto 5?

[Robbie]

IV + SA = Amazingly good win.

SA = Win

IV = Win

I've liked them all a lot.

[drama]

to me it just didn't have the 'GTA' feel if you get me.

And what was wrong with GTA 4 anyway? I thought it was a good play and that it did alot of things excellently. I think some of you may have set your expectations too high, as in terms of gameplay, graphics etc it is the best GTA game to date.

[Azul]

No, no I don't.

[Earthquake]

to me it just didn't have the 'GTA' feel if you get me.

GTA = Grand theft auto, it had everything to do with Grand theft auto.

[drama]

Yes obviously.. i'm just saying it didn't have the same 'wow' factor as previous GTA's, regardless of if it had much better graphics (which i have to admit are stunning) etc.

GTA = Grand theft auto, it had everything to do with Grand theft auto.

[Earthquake]

Yes obviously.. i'm just saying it didn't have the same 'wow' factor as previous GTA's, regardless of if it had much better graphics (which i have to admit are stunning) etc.

I find previous Grand theft autos rather boring compared to the imagination/adventure put into this one. I guess the countryside on SA is rather amazing and brings great atmosphere to the game, IV just tops it.

[Frodo13.]

I think that GTA V will arrive on the next gen of consoles, however I think installments like SA and VC will come in 2/3 year intervels as DLC for BOTH consoles.

[kk.]

tbh IV wasn't great and didn't deserve it's 10. It has many glitches and sometimes quite unrealistic. It should be more human like as in characters should look like us. Beowulf standards would be good because they at least look similar to us (this is the film not game)

[GommeInc]

And what was wrong with GTA 4 anyway? I thought it was a good play and that it did alot of things excellently. I think some of you may have set your expectations too high, as in terms of gameplay, graphics etc it is the best GTA game to date.

I found it incredibly short and not many amazing things happened. There was hardly any driving cars through tricky areas, random warehouse explosions, lack of corrupt and hateable people... It lacked alot compared to other GTAs... You rarely went inside buildings and had shoot ups. Lack of car chases and you didn't really know much about the characters, the main facts got chucked at you, but you never got to learn more about them. It was completeable within a few days, while GTA:SA was something you could play for a week and has a more interesting storyline e.g. corrupt family, you kill them off, there were loads of missions before you found out they were corrupt and they were actually fun e.g. you drive around in a car and I remember a policeman hanging onto the bonnet and getting chopped up in the process. Nothing as amazing as that happened in IV :/ I enjoyed the game, but it came to an hault too soon. The gameplay was brilliant, but I wanted it to carry on, it stopped far too early and you only had one main rivalry, rather than loads e.g. GTA III, Vice City and San Andreas, where there loads. GTA III is one game I'll remember, I liked the mansion overlooking the sea, it was good for police fights and just looked amazing.

I agree with kk., it's not worth a 10/10. Definitely between a 9-10 like 9.7, it just didn't last long as a playable game. I don't see many people talking about it now that had it early while people played SA for ages!

[drama]

yeah to above i agree, i stopped playing GTA IV after about 2 weeks, but sometimes i play SA on my PS2 after years