Sri Lanka stars in shooting with 5 dead

[Twist]

How can you just argue about the punctuation of it?
This does not matter.
What matters is, is that 8 people reported dead because of some disgusting gunmen shooting at innocent people.

Maybe next time before you argue, take a look at the subject.

May they R.I.P

My god you should shut up.
Ofcourse we know how serious this is, it's just that the thread starter won't let a little comment go.

[Smiddy]

This is a Pakistan with a tighter security... They are in deep "" because of a bunch of attention seekers who believe they are more important than the world around them.

Pakistan won't host any sporting events (cricket/football/whatever) for a while. Like Minstrels said, defiantly not co-hosting the world cup in 2011. Might have to be moved to Abu Dhabi now!
Shame for Pakistan's cricketers, cos they're a good bunch of players who deserve to have the chance to play at home.
Shame for Sri Lankan cricketers, who gave Pakistan a chance to redeem itself.
Cricket Australia & Pakistani Cricket Board are in discussions about hosting 2007's tour of Pakistan in a neutral venue (likely to be England...) for 2010.

Not just bad for Cricket, but a bad day for sports in general.

[Geraint]

It's done for publicity. The group want to show that no matter how much police they have, they can still kill. Sri Lanka's players could have easily been killed. How can you miss with a rocket launcher?

[[DC]eption]

Some absolute mugs in this world.

[Loser]

The title is not misleading at all.


Sir lanka stars where involved in a shooting and 5 people are reported to be dead.

Sri Lanka stars in shooting with 5 dead

:S

Don't cry about it *REMOVED*

Edited by Garion (Forum Moderator): Please do not be rude toward other members, thanks .

[J0SH]

Taliban are deadly

[Cixso]

My god you should shut up.
Ofcourse we know how serious this is, it's just that the thread starter won't let a little comment go.

How ironic, I've made the same number of replies as you have (replying to you) regarding the situation yet you argue your case as I do.

Define how I won't let it go, when you have defined it, look at your own posts and compare the 2.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

Don't cry about it *REMOVED*

Edited by Garion (Forum Moderator): Please do not be rude toward other members, thanks .

I'll cry if I want to cry.

Got a problem with that? Better go deal with it because there nothing I can do to help you.

lmao.

[Twist]

How ironic, I've made the same number of replies as you have (replying to you) regarding the situation yet you argue your case as I do.

Define how I won't let it go, when you have defined it, look at your own posts and compare the 2.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.


I'll cry if I want to cry.

Got a problem with that? Better go deal with it because there nothing I can do to help you.

lmao.

To be honest, you started off the whole thing by replying to what me and Minstrels said when there was no need.
So just shut up now, you douche.

[Cixso]

To be honest, you started off the whole thing by replying to what me and Minstrels said when there was no need.
So just shut up now, you douche.

I didn't deny I started it off.

I did start it, I am arguing my case. However you are also arguing your case, so technically you can not point at me and say I won't let it go when you also will not let it go.

You owned your self. That is what you call a total fail.