Yeah, this isnt exacty the best idea as many have posted already, and i don't feel like re-typing peoples points.
Although i do understand what you mean Dom, although it would be nice
i think it would be kinda lame![]()

Yeah, this isnt exacty the best idea as many have posted already, and i don't feel like re-typing peoples points.
Although i do understand what you mean Dom, although it would be nice
i think it would be kinda lame![]()
Ryan
Haha iArch
The only decent idea I have had that actually got used was the new members having to have post checked!
Ill think of another one, one day...![]()
Yerr your 1 idea ahead of me, i havnt helped or given anything at all![]()
Ryan
That's not true, being a part of the discussion is also a big part of the process of making improvements. Anyone who contributes a legitimate point or helps to further the discussion is helping. There's a reason why all members can reply to feedback threads and not just management, everyone has different opinions, viewpoints, and conclusions and when you listen to as many different points of view as you can, you make a more informed and usually better decision
On the topic of the thread I really have little to add, I don't think that there need to be rewards, the police don't come give you a lollipop for not shopliftingUsually what you do is reward people for being good, not for not being bad. And people are rewarded for being good, via MOTM. Yes, its not a perfect system but unless you have a better one (in which case I'm all ears) I think its a good system. I don't think your system would be a good replacement because its a reward for not being bad, as opposed to for being good. I think the view you're taking on infractions is a little off, you're viewing an infraction as something that is bound to happen and should be expected, while its really something that ideally shouldn't happen, just as an arrest or speeding shouldn't happen.
Last edited by nvrspk4; 29-05-2009 at 06:14 AM.
It costs nothing to be a good friend.
American and Proud
I also use the account nvrspk on other computers.
![]()
As nvr said, you have done contributions! Your posts to this thread in paticular have been good
That's not true, being a part of the discussion is also a big part of the process of making improvements. Anyone who contributes a legitimate point or helps to further the discussion is helping. There's a reason why all members can reply to feedback threads and not just management, everyone has different opinions, viewpoints, and conclusions and when you listen to as many different points of view as you can, you make a more informed and usually better decision
On the topic of the thread I really have little to add, I don't think that there need to be rewards, the police don't come give you a lollipop for not shopliftingUsually what you do is reward people for being good, not for not being bad. And people are rewarded for being good, via MOTM. Yes, its not a perfect system but unless you have a better one (in which case I'm all ears) I think its a good system. I don't think your system would be a good replacement because its a reward for not being bad, as opposed to for being good. I think the view you're taking on infractions is a little off, you're viewing an infraction as something that is bound to happen and should be expected, while its really something that ideally shouldn't happen, just as an arrest or speeding shouldn't happen.
Ok final idea.. Take me off the DNHL?
My local policeman gave me a lolli (and my friends) once![]()
This may sound stupid but what is MOTM
i prob know i just cant think of it atm
Ryan
As probably mentioned, this is already sort of in place. The reward is having a profile picture and half the stuff that cautioned members don't get. It's just the other way round, you start as "being good!" rather than "an average guy."
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!