Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 46 of 46
  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,481
    Tokens
    3,140

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mentor View Post
    Same - slow boot was windows issue only. Plus 3.5 is more secure than 3, not less o.0
    It is insecure because it is new and not all exploits have been found, where as 3.0 has been around for a while meaning there are less security holes in it.
    Chippiewill.


  2. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 00chips View Post
    It is insecure because it is new and not all exploits have been found, where as 3.0 has been around for a while meaning there are less security holes in it.
    Surely the opposite is the same here too? 3.0 has been around for longer, thus people have had a longer time to find holes - 3.5 hasn't been around for too long, so less security flaws have been found out? Both sides sort of have their issues, the only problem with new releases are reliability and any holes that have been re-opened that were fixed in previous releases.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tunbridge Wells, Kent
    Posts
    5,063
    Tokens
    1,624

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    My Firefox opens quite quickly? Might just be the power of my PC?
    Never argue with an idiot, he'll drag you down to his level, and beat you with experience.

    Quote Originally Posted by Recursion
    *oh trust me
    *I would NEVER go ATi
    And 15 mins later...
    Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 5850 1024MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card £195.73 1 £195.73
    *ordered.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flisker View Post
    My Firefox opens quite quickly? Might just be the power of my PC?
    The latest one is fine, 3.0 (or 3.5 before the update, can't remember) took ages to load.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,481
    Tokens
    3,140

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Surely the opposite is the same here too? 3.0 has been around for longer, thus people have had a longer time to find holes - 3.5 hasn't been around for too long, so less security flaws have been found out? Both sides sort of have their issues, the only problem with new releases are reliability and any holes that have been re-opened that were fixed in previous releases.
    No, because more of the holes which were ever there have been patched.

    If you need convincing then listen to the "Security Now" Podcast (Between episode 203 and 207)
    Chippiewill.


  6. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Update to 3.5.2 and it fixed (booting) - plus audio/video tags mean browser can play video and audio without any plugins etc. So no fat slow flash to load, just video decoded directly via the browser

    3.5 is based on 3.0, most the security holes in it where in 3.0 as well
    Last edited by Mentor; 06-08-2009 at 06:04 PM.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •