Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 58
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N!ck View Post
    From Wikipedia:

    "On February 8, 2007 it was announced by Network World that "If the United States found itself under a major cyberattack aimed at undermining the nation’s critical information infrastructure, the Department of Defense is prepared, based on the authority of the president, to launch an actual bombing of an attack source or a cyber counterattack.""

    Oh dear.
    WIN!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N!ck View Post
    From Wikipedia:

    "On February 8, 2007 it was announced by Network World that "If the United States found itself under a major cyberattack aimed at undermining the nation’s critical information infrastructure, the Department of Defense is prepared, based on the authority of the president, to launch an actual bombing of an attack source or a cyber counterattack.""

    Oh dear.
    Seriously, why not just storm it with police lol? Probably cheaper lmao

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    8,725
    Tokens
    3,789
    Habbo
    HotelUser

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N!ck View Post
    From Wikipedia:

    "On February 8, 2007 it was announced by Network World that "If the United States found itself under a major cyberattack aimed at undermining the nation’s critical information infrastructure, the Department of Defense is prepared, based on the authority of the president, to launch an actual bombing of an attack source or a cyber counterattack.""

    Oh dear.
    Could be true, but if it's posted on Wikipedia then it's questionable.
    I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,572
    Tokens
    584

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yeah, you could understand the full extent and severity of a cyberattack into critical information is just as bad as anything else. So to prevent such vital information getting out then you must kill them haha.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N!ck View Post
    From Wikipedia:

    "On February 8, 2007 it was announced by Network World that "If the United States found itself under a major cyberattack aimed at undermining the nation’s critical information infrastructure, the Department of Defense is prepared, based on the authority of the president, to launch an actual bombing of an attack source or a cyber counterattack.""

    Oh dear.
    That's pretty cool but it'd be coming from computers from all over the world so bombing would be useless.

    Frankly the best way to kill the internet or cut the US off is to sever all the telephone lines under the sea, I imagine it's quite easy judging by how easy they've severed in the past, they take many weeks to fix usually as well. I do wonder why terrorist groups wanting loads of attention don't actually do this, it's easy and you'll cause an enormous amount of disruption.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    That's pretty cool but it'd be coming from computers from all over the world so bombing would be useless.

    Frankly the best way to kill the internet or cut the US off is to sever all the telephone lines under the sea, I imagine it's quite easy judging by how easy they've severed in the past, they take many weeks to fix usually as well. I do wonder why terrorist groups wanting loads of attention don't actually do this, it's easy and you'll cause an enormous amount of disruption.
    Satellites?
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    4,918
    Tokens
    126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    US hosted websites would still be available. And there's be too many to break to completely cut them off. Plus those that go through Mexico or Canada then accross the sea.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    You'd still cause downtime in some areas and it would be slower to say the least, I'm not too sure how many telephones lines there is though? And yeah satellites would be used for essential things (Government related activities) but that's not plausible for home users.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    You can get a satellite internet connection, IIRC a few yrs back they were like $50k though lolz
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The root servers of the internet are pretty safe i imagine, since there designed with the capasity to handle more aless every pc with an internet connection at once anyway (so even a bot net of a good % of the planet would not be all that effective)
    That said most requests would never get near the root servers, alot of stuff never needs to be forwarded that high, they only resolve the tld's etc
    Even with tld down, the sites internal to specific countarys would all work normally, many isp equally would likely have a pretty large amount of domain resolutions cached as well
    The internet still has its roots in technolgy designed to surivive nuclear war, its pretty danm resiliant as a whole

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •