The Ashes Tour, 2009.

[Tintinnabulate]

Not trying to be sarky in my previous post, was just stating how it would most probably of been laid down if the player didn't go OTT.

I know you weren't I was just wondering what you meant. You are probably right anyway.

[-Heart]

Bell gone for 72 .

55.2 overs played, England 181-4. We won the toss and Strauss decided to bat. Looked bad early on when Cook went to make it 12-1, he finished on 10 runs. Strauss was the next to go with 55 runs to his name, making it 114-2. Next to fall was Collingwood (I think) for 24, then Bell for 72. Trotters is in and on 4 not out, Prior partnering him but with no runs yet.

[Tintinnabulate]

Although England are 8 down, 312 isnt that bad of a score. If England can get early wickets then Australia will be in trouble.

[Throne Sofa]

Although England are 8 down, 312 isnt that bad of a score. If England can get early wickets then Australia will be in trouble.

It really is considering the circumstances. It's the middle order letting us down again with the bat.

[-Heart]

England bowled out for 332, Australia are 73-0.

What a pile of dog ****.

[luce]

Au 80-1

[StefanWolves]

89-3, all gone to Broad, what a prospect.

Now come on the rest of the bowlers, try and match Broad, if we do, then we seriously have a chance of winning.

Broads stats;

3 wickets, 8 runs, 16 deliveries (this session, i think) ~ top class.

[StefanWolves]

Yes! Swann! 108-5! England on top! come on the boys!!!!!!!!!

[Tintinnabulate]

Just happy Flintoff has no wickets. Probably crying in his head that selfish git.
Poor Australia Hope they do better in the 2nd innings.

[StefanWolves]

Just happy Flintoff has no wickets. Probably crying in his head that selfish git.
Poor Australia Hope they do better in the 2nd innings.

wow, no praise for england at all?

109-6

Swann again