new ruless

[scottish]

so what difference has the rule change done rli? :S

[xxMATTGxx]

If the person you are going to post is mostly covered up, then that is acceptable. Although there is line and the Moderators will see whether its acceptable or not.

[Catzsy]

so what difference has the rule change done rli? :S

It has basically re-clarified the position as it was but seemed to get 'lost' in the condensing of the rules i.e. you are allowed to show images with swearing and mild content provided it is a link/spoiler with a warning. It is now back in the rules.

[Chippiewill]

Can we extend it to fully topless? The only difference is that we are forced to put it in spoilers when it isn't even sexually offensive, much. And seriously, what percentage of the forum is not going to open the spoiler anyway?

[Catzsy]

Can we extend it to fully topless? The only difference is that we are forced to put it in spoilers when it isn't even sexually offensive, much. And seriously, what percentage of the forum is not going to open the spoiler anyway?

For what sensible reason? How would it postively contribute to the forum?

[scottish]

wasn't that already allowed as people used to have them in their sigs :S

[Catzsy]

wasn't that already allowed as people used to have them in their sigs :S

Did you read my post above?

It has basically re-clarified the position as it was but seemed to get 'lost' in the condensing of the rules i.e. you are allowed to show images with swearing and mild content provided it is a link/spoiler with a warning. It is now back in the rules.

[Chippiewill]

For what sensible reason? How would it postively contribute to the forum?

Confines men to a porno thread?

Edit: Just a thought, but...

Warning - this link/spoiler contains content which may not be suitable for younger members

[The Professor]

Can we extend it to fully topless? The only difference is that we are forced to put it in spoilers when it isn't even sexually offensive, much. And seriously, what percentage of the forum is not going to open the spoiler anyway?

Can of worms, slippery slope ^

Re Catzsy's edit, obviously I didn't see what he put before it was changed but do we have to put those exact words as the warning?

[myke]

this is just like a modfest in this thread.

most people can judge themselves whether things are mildly sexual or clean, i don't see why, when we aren't staff, that we should have to put

HI THIS TEXT IS RED AND BOLD AND THEREFORE THIS CONTAINS A RUDE PICTURE *+*=

i think

"I warn you, this picture could be mildly explicit " would do.

The colour, font, format or whatever you want to call it really has no effect.

i kinda feel a bit insulted at how we're being told what's explicit and what isn't. we all have common sense, no matter how stupid some people are on this forum. i'm not disabled irl nor am I a "******" so I'd prefer to leave the judging of whether something is explicit or not to my own concious and common sense, however, if another person finds it explicit, or it is clearly explicit then sure, do something about it.

idk if that post made any sense at all but yh brb going to get a coffee