new ruless

[Jordy]

I think these additions to the rules are a complete mess and a joke to be fair. I don't think yourselves even understand them nevermind anyone else, this thread has made that clear to me. It's all down to opinion, it's not black and white like the rules always have been (and should be). A thirteen year-old could go in a news agents and buy a 'lads mag' such as Nuts or Zoo which features topless women, that isn't illegal so I'd say it is appropriate? Yet yourselves say that a topless woman isn't appropriate?

I'm not campaigning to see boobs all over the forum (I have no objections though ) it's just these additions to the rules are a mess. Recently there's been lots of things in Feedback suggesting that the forum should be aimed at a older age group to move with the times (Sparked by Mentor's thread about sexual acts) and Nvrspk said something last week saying that it's going to be looking into or something. If the forum is going to allow swearing, nudity etc just do it full on or don't do it at all, I'm not fussed either way just don't do this half-hearted rubbish which is neither here nor there.

Topless pic btw

Show Hide

Sorry LOL

[Chippiewill]

This is what he put before:
Warning ~ The following contains mildly sexual photography, young un's don't peek

So judge for yourself whether he was taking it seriously or not?
Also surely it is easier just to C&P from the rules? Anyway Matt has said it is fine provided it is a sensible warning.

Nah, I had something funnier on that post, that's from the first post...

It was something like:

Warning ~ If for some reason you don't like topless women then don't peek

[xxMATTGxx]

Catzy, it's a warning, whether he's being serious or not is another matter, he still warned.

Why should we go trapsing to the rules to get something which we can simply type. "Warning may be seen as inappropriate", I know you're trying to enforce rules or whatever but we're not vegetables and we have own our hands to type with and our own brains to thing about whats acceptable and what's not.

Just the way I see it anyway

The "Warning" was an example and anyone can type the warning as long as it warns the users. Many images can be posted as long as most areas are covered and are not full on nudity/porn. You aren't going to get an infraction for it. If you forget the warning, the Moderator will add the warning/spoiler for you. This is just to clarify what is and what isn't acceptable. We aren't taking anything away from you, we are making it so the images you do post aren't full on nudity and also to make sure that the images are contained in spoilers with a simple warning. Which you can type for yourself.

Edit: The warning you type as to be sensible as well.

[The Professor]

Tbh, even typing MAJOR BOOBAGE ALERT is warning the users about the contents of the spoilers, which is the point of having a warning. You can't expect everyone to switch into formal mode when they post a questionable picture!

[xxMATTGxx]

Tbh, even typing MAJOR BOOBAGE ALERT is warning the users about the contents of the spoilers, which is the point of having a warning. You can't expect everyone to switch into formal mode when they post a questionable picture!

I said they can do their own warning babe.

[The Professor]

I said they can do their own warning babe.

This is what he put before:
Warning ~ The following contains mildly sexual photography, young un's don't peek

So judge for yourself whether he was taking it seriously or not?
Also surely it is easier just to C&P from the rules? Anyway Matt has said it is fine provided it is a sensible warning.

Sorry babe I was talking about that post ^ my bad xxx

[Yoshimitsui]

So considering you have to be 18 legally to access adult content it does not fit into the 14-16 age range and so it is obviously not allowed. You know full well you can't post it and so therefore this thread is rather pointless.

[Catzsy]

Catzy, it's a warning, whether he's being serious or not is another matter, he still warned.

Why should we go trapsing to the rules to get something which we can simply type. "Warning may be seen as inappropriate", I know you're trying to enforce rules or whatever but we're not vegetables and we have own our hands to type with and our own brains to thing about whats acceptable and what's not.

Just the way I see it anyway

No it was not a serious warning but what you have said is sensible and I don't understand the rant at the end. My name is Catzsy too. Thanks

[myke]

it's not a rant. it's the way i feel.

i don't understand your rant at the end about me missing a letter out of your name

and atlast, someone sees sense in what i say

[Catzsy]

it's not a rant. it's the way i feel.

i don't understand your rant at the end about me missing a letter out of your name

and atlast, someone sees sense in what i say

Well tbh I am quite sensitive about my name cos it never seems to be spelt right But yes you do make a lot of sense.