Since when was this a rule?

[-WooTWooTWooT-]

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Publishing private information of another member is against the rules.
Whether is is correct or not doesn't matter.

???????????????????????

[Catzsy]

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Publishing private information of another member is against the rules.
Whether is is correct or not doesn't matter.

???????????????????????

The full post would be helpful as that doesn't reflect the full picture.
Posting any private information without the other's consent is against the rules.

[Immenseman]

I think it's just common sense. Obviously, nobody can comment on this individual case because like Rosie mentioned we haven't seen the post where this edit was added on to

[-WooTWooTWooT-]

You added to the edit, whether it is correct or not doesn't matter. That's not in the rules.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....9&postcount=17

Thanks.

And Jake you're not going to be able to see as it got edited :rolleyes:

Thanks.

[xxMATTGxx]

Edit: Oh you talking about her edit?

[Immenseman]

Which was my point exactly. You can sort things like this out better by PMing the Forum Manager. However, he has already shown you the rule which you violated.

[xxMATTGxx]

Right, let's get this sorted.

Rule:

A5. Do not post private details or information – We do not allow you to post private information about yourself due to security concerns. Disclosing any information about another forum user without their consent is also not allowed. This includes:

Private messages
Reputation comments
Private conversations (MSN, Habbo, etc.)
Images / videos of the user or social networking profiles (Bebo, Facebook, etc.)
Trying to organize real life meet-ups
It is also not allowed to give out the personal details (specific address, phone number etc) of anyone, forum user or otherwise.
You are, however, allowed to post pictures of yourself, although they are NOT allowed in your avatar or signature.

Her edit isn't breaking any rules at all.

[-WooTWooTWooT-]

Which was my point exactly. You can sort things like this out better by PMing the Forum Manager. However, he has already shown you the rule which you violated.

or not.

Thanks.

[-WooTWooTWooT-]

Right, let's get this sorted.

Rule:



Her edit isn't breaking any rules at all.

READ THE LAST PART OF THE EDIT. THEN CHECK THE HISTORY OF THE POST WHICH WAS EDITED.

THAT'S NOT IN THE RULES

*FACEPALM*

Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not double post within the 15 minute editing period. Thanks.

[Catzsy]

Which was my point exactly. You can sort things like this out better by PMing the Forum Manager. However, he has already shown you the rule which you violated.

He is actually posting on behalf of mwah. This was a sticky one and what he posted could have easily been used by adding hotmail.com etc. Actually on reflection I do think that maybe I have personalised the edit too much but it was a long hot busy night. The rule is there though - just added to which sometimes is done to explain it further to the member.