Rate the moderation on this forum

[JACKTARD]

I'd say 3 - Average. They do their job to a good enough standard but their is substantial room for improvement.

basically what i think.

[Immenseman]

have to ignore me saying their instead of there though. how vile!

[Chippiewill]

[dirrty]

i'd say good. all of the SMs do a good job, however i can't really say the same for all of the normal moderators. the majority do a decent job at moderating, but one or two do let the team down at times. such as i don't think i've seen a few mods doing their thang around the forum, like making edits, closing threads etc. sure theres a bit more to moderating than the things above, but i'd say those are the areas that most of members can judge upon.

but yeah, as a collective they do a good job. theres room for improvement, but that occurs everywhere and i think mattgarner is doing a good job making those improvements to make the moderating department a much more better team. sure at times some members deem certain mods quite 'strict' or whatever for making certain decisions, but at the end of the day, if ya don't like it, report it.

[The Professor]

I can't say I come accross it enough these days to form an opinion.

[Xoim]

Yeah I think 4 Catzy and Laurenish are pretty good, they contact me when I have done something wrong like everyone and they are also very pleasant.

Unlike other forums where mods are very dull at least HxF mods have personality :L

[Caution]

I think it's generally good, but I see posts where they've missed it quite a lot. You can't blame them though, really. They have to put up with complete ********s most of the time.

[GommeInc]

I voted average - Super Moderators are generally okay, but some moderators let down the team. I suggest strangling of the bad ones

[luce]

Many people would say moderation is poor, these are the people who get infracted a lot because they have it harder since they sometimes go over the top and therefore are treated harshly for minor things.

I feel that the moderation in general is 'Good' however for the standard of this forum I would rate it 'Average'. The mods do very well, but only as good as the rest of the teams in percentage above other forums.

Also I think that Catzsy deserves a medal/promotion.

I don't think many users (ones who are banned are exempt ) have many more infractions than me, obviously some do. I still think the moderation is alright and I accept that the ones I currently have are fair

I agree with you about Catzsy though, fantastic for the moderation department. I genuinely think she takes it from poor > average. Without her I think I'd be voting poor which is a pretty big compliment me thinks.

Couldn't agree more with the compliments about Catzsy there

I voted average - Super Moderators are generally okay, but some moderators let down the team. I suggest strangling of the bad ones

odear


yeah i think there are a few people on the team who need to become more active but isn't that the same in every department? Personally i think we need a bigger team at the moment.

The moderation in spam is only strict and OTT sometimes because some members who post in there are the same? No one in there exactly makes it easy for us.

[Calvin]

as other people said, super mods okay but some normal mods let the team down .