Derren Brown - How To Control The Nation

[Kardan]

Lol, no camera moves as much as that does, honestly.

I don't want to argue anymore, leave it be. We all have our own views.

What do you mean that no camera moves around that much? I'm pretty sure if you shake a camera up and down really fast, then it would shake really fast? :S

[Neil]

Lol, no camera moves as much as that does, honestly.

I don't want to argue anymore, leave it be. We all have our own views.

What the hell is wrong with your brain? Have you never used a camera before?! Those camera weigh quite a lot and even a small hand-held camera is hard to keep steady without some form of tripod.

Edit - Lol bad repped, shame whoever it was didn't leave a name.

[Japan]

wow 29 people viewing the thread.
Anyway that was a complete fail, my sister didn't get stuck to the chair.

[efq]

Lol, its on a tripod as this video shows, its deliberetly moved up and down, side to side.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWeXOGfiqxg

If you can't believe that then you are unbeatable.

[<Nick>]

What the hell is wrong with your brain? Have you never used a camera before?! Those camera weigh quite a lot and even a small hand-held camera is hard to keep steady without some form of tripod.

Edit - Lol bad repped, shame whoever it was didn't leave a name.

Obv who it was lol + yeah he had no tripod so there is a reason why that camera moved that much


Edit- i dont see no tripod in that vid..

[Misawa]

Thats not what i was saying.. I was on about how you seem to enter threads that interest you, give your opinion, and anyone that disagrees will get a bashing with words from you. Lets see, you were bias in the inglorious thread because lets see, isnt this the film that you worked on? With tarentino? Hm, you ripped district 9 because it was being rated 9 on IMDB because you thought it was bad. Have you ever thought that people dont really give a crap what critics say and they judge for themselves? Because D9 was actually a great film, according to real people

Just so everyone knows, that image was the same throughout the show

Actually, if you read, I thought District 9 was a great film. And my opinion of Inglourious *******s is totally unbiased, and D9 does indeed pale in comparison. I make movies for a living and I critique them for a living. You can't get much more real than a professional with an encylopaedic knowledge of film. So there you go, chap.

[Kardan]

Lol, its on a tripod as this video shows, its deliberetly moved up and down, side to side.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWeXOGfiqxg

If you can't believe that then you are unbeatable.

If you're referring to the video that 'cuts' back. You do know that that was used to switch from pre-recorded to live. The bit before they switch to camera 2 is re-recorded, then they switch to re-recorded footage of camera 2, then switch back to camera one but it's now live. Or that's what all the evidence suggests. I thought everyone had figured out the shaking was a digital feature added after recording anyway?

Ahh, it wasn't the cut back video. But yes, I thought it was digitally added in, the shake, as not to make the split screen any harder? Why does it matter anyway, we all know he DIDN'T predict the lottery and it was more of a fact of getting the numbers on the balls, not predicting the numbers.

[kk.]

Lol, its on a tripod as this video shows, its deliberetly moved up and down, side to side.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWeXOGfiqxg

If you can't believe that then you are unbeatable.

youre not getting what were saying. I was saying that have you ever tried to hold a camera whilst filming, A small one, as said, is hard enough. The whole point was that it was 'meant to be' handheld which obviously it wasnt, but thats not what i was saying

[efq]

If you're referring to the video that 'cuts' back. You do know that that was used to switch from pre-recorded to live. The bit before they switch to camera 2 is re-recorded, then they switch to re-recorded footage of camera 2, then switch back to camera one but it's now live - and not on a tripod. Or that's what all the evidence suggests. I thought everyone had figured out the shaking was a digital feature added after recording anyway?

I didn't understand half of that but I know this was the camera that broadcasted live on my television when Channel 4 said it would. I've never seen a camera move in such a square shaped way in my life that it was unbelieveable.

If it was a feature, what a odd reason to add it in for then?

[kk.]

Actually, if you read, I thought District 9 was a great film. And my opinion of Inglourious *******s is totally unbiased, and D9 does indeed pale in comparison. I make movies for a living and I critique them for a living. You can't get much more real than a professional with an encylopaedic knowledge of film. So there you go, chap.

I dont know how you can say its completely unbiased if you worked on it. Seriously. If I'd worked on something id be doing my best to promote it, similar to when im designing.. Professionals dont tend to be the best critics, if you havnt noticed. Theyll nit pick through anything, film, tv, art, game, and point out all the bad points, tending to completely miss the good. Reviews from real people tend to be the most reliable, as they are real people. They think about things the same as most and so know what people like.