
i'm quite sure if a race of aliens came and lived in your country and you then got infected by an unknown spray which turned you into an alien you'd probably be frantically swearing quite a bit too.
hardly, its an adaptation. you might as well say that 'the day after tomorrow' is allah cleansing the world of white people.
could you write a script for a film that would score more than 8.5/10 on IMDB - a world-known reliable movie website? until you can, you have no right to say that.
As I found out in the other thread, the main characters script was actually improvised, so I'd expect it to have a lot of swearing in
Actors don't have personal scripts catered to them. There is one sold script for the entire film. He would have had lines, he obviously chose to ignore them and the director went with them. So they must have been better than what he wrote.
As I said on the first page; the whole script wasn't improvised, only the documentary scenes were. Which makes sense because only improvisation can give it that raw documentary feel.
...
http://www.movieretriever.com/blog/4...-of-district-9MovieRetriever: What was the most challenging element of the production – either specific or general?
COPLEY: One of the more challenging things was actually the ADR process afterwards – recreating a performance that you improvise on the day. There were never lines. So, the speech patterns are very real – he’ll stutter, repeat himself, "um" and "uh." Repeating that in a dark room with a microphone and you've got to be crying and you've got to be happy and you've got to be beaten up ... it's something that actors don't seem to talk about much but it's a massive thing. We're lucky that we use a lot of our original audio, but that's because of the nature of our film. Most films now, ninety to a hundred percent of what you're hearing the characters say wasn't said on the actual day, it was recreated. There's a kind of magic that we had on this shoot on the set and I was very determined to get it either better or the same than we had it on that day. As a non-actor, it concerned me how good I would be at that. But it seemed I had an aptitude for it and I did get it by the end.
MovieRetriever: You mention improvising. Tell our readers about the process of District 9.
COPLEY: All of my dialogue, all of my actual lines are improvised. There's a script but Neill works within a structure. "This is what needs to happen in the scene – go there, evict the guy, pull the guy outside, go inside and see the computers." And then I'll work with Jason and improvise and keep throwing stuff, throwing different options. Physically, you've got to be aware of where you're moving for continuity. Once we get something down, then I can change the lines, but try and be IN the shack at this point in the scene so that it will cut with other runs. It was a fascinating filmmaking process. It was very different from the way people normally do it.
so it was basically improvised. He said there was a script, but the director gave him directions and just went with it, using original audio etc.
The whole point of it being set in South Africa relates to the apartheid-era and the general themes surrounding it like social segregation. The black people being seen as equal at the aliens' level is the whole point. I'm sure someone involved with this area of the film was Nigerian anyway, can't remember who now.
But I couldn't say this was a bad film - on the contrary, it was very well-made and to say anything along the lines of 'if you liked this then you haven't seen many films' is just ignorant really.
tbh i found the beginning extremely boring, unless it picks up half way through (which i tried to watch but couldn't find the time, and tbh didn't want to because i disliked the first half) i stick with my opinion of it being a terrible movie.
yeah, the beginning was awful. i was looking around like wth o.O i almost left half way through. i endured the end and it wasn't all that much better.
I must admit I was thinking of leaving at one point (this sounds stupid lol), but I was thinking about other things at the time and I guess I wasn't concentrating on it properly and just thought all the emotions and themes it raises were kind of overwhelming.
Either way, I thought the visuals themselves were immense. I was watching Jurassic Park the other day and couldn't help noticing the way the dinosaurs move on screen, it just doesn't look like there's a real animal next to the people. That made me realise how amazingly real they managed to make the aliens and any special effects in this look.
At the beginning I thought the film didn't look very good myself, but I just gave it a chance and understood it I guess. I'm actually looking forward to the sequel (District 10?).
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!