The first thing that needs to happen is it needs to become a bigger part of Moderation. In my opinion during they key hours - that is probably 16:00 - 22:00 no new member should be waiting any more than half an hour for their posts to be approved. I know Moderators aren't superheroes, I know they're only volunteers, I know they have a lot of work to do but Management have decided to introduce this system and therefore it needs to become just as important, if not more important, than the control of rule breaking.Originally Posted by Immenseman
Secondly it should be reduced. It seems the general suggestion is to five and that probably is the safest amount to lower it to. Nevertheless I still think 5 is too much. I think 1 is too much. However providing the performance of the Moderation team improves as per my previous paragraph we should see a considerable improvement.
Yeah why is it people have to go and get a life :@.
Yes that is indeed correct. I joined because I was becoming a News Reporter. A relatively high proportion of our active users are staff and it's easy enough for us to retain them! I think Tom made the point earlier in the thread that a big problem is the elitist nature of a lot of the categories or forums here on HxF. New members are ignored or actively antagonised and it doesn't make the Forum too appealing to those without a very thick skin!
I agree to a certain extent that we are probably seen as the harshest Forum around, however I don't think there is a massive amount we can do here because it's what makes Habbox different to a lot of the other Forums that are quite frankly immature and annoying. However this does lead me on to my next point:
In light of the fact that Habbox might be seen quite harsh to outsiders, and indeed it is seen as quite harsh by a lot of it's members I think it's important weekly updates are used to maintain a diverse and appropriate set of rules that maintain order but aren't too strict. There are two things that we do have to appreciate though:
1) From my experience as AFM, it was occasionally quite difficult to find updates every single week - week in, week out. Perhaps then we make it every two weeks. Even if the changes are only minor, such as changes in the wording of rules, at least it makes it seem as in things are happening. When we don't see any public updates it can frustrate members who can't see everything that is behind the scenes.
2) You are never going to be able keep every member happy. Some people would only ever be satisfied if we abolished the rules altogether.
I don't think anyone is going to agree with me here, and I guess you are right. My opinion here is just backward and outdatedOriginally Posted by Immenseman
.
That's a fair point but I do really think it is something that could work if given the proper attention and the proper power. I just think it should be done on a much smaller scale and given to someone who can be trusted to exert a lot of power. If this is to happen then it could well be the perfect solution to the problems Habbox are facing.Originally Posted by Immenseman
I am forced to agree to a certain extent. I think the current management team are brilliant and they have the right people in the right positions however my recent browsing of the Forum upon my return suggested that things have lost the momentum they had in the Summer. This could indirectly be part of my earlier point that it is an awkward time of year, but the people in the positions of power should be exercising that power.Originally Posted by Immenseman
This kind of sums up my original points, something does need to be done before it gets serious.
As I mentioned previously it can be quite difficult to find things to update each and every week. The Forum Manager has nothing to do with name changes, last time I checked :eusa_danc.







. However providing the performance of the Moderation team improves as per my previous paragraph we should see a considerable improvement.
P). If you didn't have such determination then I don't think you would really visit again. The community is hardly thriving.
Reply With Quote





