Please sir, can i have more threads?

[Sammeth.]

Why were you attempting to format a swearword if you thought it would appear as stars anyway? I don't get that.

[Accipiter]

the stars would enlarge would they not? i wanted to create a slant into the next sentence.

[Sammeth.]

the stars would enlarge would they not? i wanted to create a slant into the next sentence.

If you wanted large stars, then post stars and make them larger rather than the swearword?

[Robbie]

yes robbie because his post was so menacing

Doesn't matter if it's menacing or not. His infraction has been judged fair because he posted an inappropriate word in huge letters and formatted it, do you think thats inline with the rules? and now he's gone completely off the subject of his infraction and is making threads for the sake of it.

What does it being 'menacing' have to do with anything?

[dirrty]

If its annoying you don't read them, but by now you should have realised the matter has changed severely.

if you had an ounce of common sense you would of realised how this forum operates. considering you've been here for some time, you should know what's acceptable, and whats not. avoiding the filter in any shape or form is against the rules. quite obvious really, and doesn't even require explaining as its self-explanatory. but then again, probably would be for those simple-minded users...

[Accipiter]

If you wanted large stars, then post stars and make them larger rather than the swearword?

then it wouldn't be as fun (n)

if you don't want to clarify it in the rules and have trouble like this in the future without pointing out in the rule to shut them up fine, but its a suggestion.

[Robbie]

then it wouldn't be as fun (n)

if you don't want to clarify it in the rules and have trouble like this in the future without pointing out in the rule to shut them up fine, but its a suggestion.

We've not had a problem like this before because people know whats right and what isn't and the majority of users accept their punishments, especially when management deem them fair.

[Immenseman]

well done robbie! you've made my point exactly. moderators are just too eager to jump to their tools rather than trying to sort things. posts that cause a detrimental effect to the forum should be dealt with. i just used the word menacing to initiate that point. not ones that are done by accident. how was he supposed to know? he wasn't because it's not any where.

[Accipiter]

Doesn't matter if it's menacing or not. His infraction has been judged fair because he posted an inappropriate word in huge letters and formatted it, do you think thats inline with the rules? and now he's gone completely off the subject of his infraction and is making threads for the sake of it.

What does it being 'menacing' have to do with anything?

theirs you turning a blind eye again, how is this thread for the sake of it, i am giving you feedback, to improove the forum, to stop this happening again, and preposterous had the nerve to call me small mind. When i see it happening much more within the staff than myself, but as i said, if you want trouble to repeat itself, like in your signature, that you clearly must not believe in, that is your problems. And i'll leave it at that.

[Sammeth.]

then it wouldn't be as fun (n)

if you don't want to clarify it in the rules and have trouble like this in the future without pointing out in the rule to shut them up fine, but its a suggestion.

I think the former part of your post sums this whole masquerade up.

Thread closed as its now had a resolution, the rule doesn't need ammending as its perfectly clear - avoiding the filter in any way shape or form is against the rules.