The letter is an insult because:
- It obviously hasn't been written with emotion, or thought, it has simply been rushed.
- The handwriting, look at it? is that about 50 words on ONE PAGE?
- The spelling, come on? he couldn't spell condolences? He's meant to be a highly educated person.
- He spelled his name WRONG? yes, it's something little, but it's still unacceptable.
Yes, I agree, the way the woman has gone to the papers etc is wrong, and stupid, but its up to her, I know I'd be a bit pissed off if I received that letter if I was in her situation, just put yourself in her position and you recieved that pile of crap.
Yes, I agree the Prime Minister had all the best intentions, and I know he has problems with his eyes and has dyslexia, but still, it is a bit bad, and I do feel sorry for him, as it shouldn't have gone to the papers. But I'm sure it isn't to hard for him to get help with writing it or have someone else writing it for him, which I don't care what you say - is his own words and ISN'T lies.
If someone else writing the letter for him from what he is saying is such lies, then tell me this - what about all these students who have DYSLEXIA, at school like Gordon Brown does - get to have people to write out their essays for them in tests like GCSE's and SATs? if it isn't their own words? It's the same sort of thing, it is their words, just someone else writing it for them. These students also sign the front of the examination paper off to show that it is there work, so, are they lying too? because they didn't write it? because that's what you saying about my idea of the PM having someone write what he is saying.
So yes. That's it, I can't be bothered arguing anymore because you obviously are NOT putting yourself in the mothers shoes. I'm sure you'd be the same as she is, you would have just gone about it in a different way - like trying to contact the PM somehow.





Reply With Quote



Anyone in the world would rather have a personal letter, not an impersonal one like you're suggesting. Again, you're moaning for the sake of moaning and don't appear to care about the content of the letter. He didn't need help anyway, it was readable - you don't appear to have noticed alot of people have been able to read it. Not everyone has perfect writing, but it takes a good brain in your head to understandable what someone is trying to say. If this woman is too lazy to take the time to read it, then I pity her and her dull, puny brain. The words were there, they made sense. That is the end of it :/
). She is a disgrace, there's no denying it. She's receiving a letter in good will, and completely rejected it without even thinking about the content. She's a horrible woman, and doesn't deserve the attention she's getting (even though the majority is bad attention). Heck, on the radio the way it's reported, she is being made to sound like a complete idiot. "A woman has got Gordon Brown to apologize over a spelling mistaking in a letter." It's pathetic, she's pathetic :/







