Hackers 'expose global warming con'

[kk.]

To peddle the myth that is global warming so the government, climate study groups and the green lobby can continue their stealth taxation to 'combat' global warming. A lot of money is being made out of absolutley nothing. Government, study groups, media and companies which make wind turbines are making a heck of a lot of money out of it, our money.

I have one question. What is UKIPs stance on global warming?

[-:Undertaker:-]

I have one question. What is UKIPs stance on global warming?

I am sure that UKIPs' policy from what I remember was sceptical, and that it favoured the need to move to nuclear power not because of climate change but because of energy security, thus making the United Kingdom energy independant rather than us relying on Russia or Libya for our oil.

Exactly what I support aswell.

[kk.]

Are you like an mp or UKIP because every thread you have posted is somehow in fcour of them. The daily mail cannot b trusted as a source an the reason that no mainstream MRI is reporting on it is because it's skeptical. I myself did a piece of coursework on global warming and found loads of evidence for the cycles planets go through, especially ours. But there was also evidence of us speeding it up,

[-:Undertaker:-]

Are you like an mp or UKIP because every thread you have posted is somehow in fcour of them. The daily mail cannot b trusted as a source an the reason that no mainstream MRI is reporting on it is because it's skeptical. I myself did a piece of coursework on global warming and found loads of evidence for the cycles planets go through, especially ours. But there was also evidence of us speeding it up,

I support UKIP yes, and you asked what UKIPs' stance on this was and I told you. I support UKIP because UKIP falls in line with my opinions, thats err how voting/politics works?

On mainstream media, yes you are right - mainstream media isn't reporting on this because its sceptical, because it would show what a big con this whole thing is and they couldn't allow that! - on your coursework you may of read some Al Gore/government fixed-stats but i'm not believing it, there is absolutly no evidence that anything that is happening now has anything remotely do to with humans.

[Ardemax]

great, but we still new renewable energy, whatever way.

and UKIP need to invest on it aswell...

[kk.]

I support UKIP yes, and you asked what UKIPs' stance on this was and I told you. I support UKIP because UKIP falls in line with my opinions, thats err how voting/politics works?

On mainstream media, yes you are right - mainstream media isn't reporting on this because its sceptical, because it would show what a big con this whole thing is and they couldn't allow that! - on your coursework you may of read some Al Gore/government fixed-stats but i'm not believing it, there is absolutly no evidence that anything that is happening now has anything remotely do to with humans.

i know how voting works, which is why i said what i said. all im saying is, i think because its your view, and also the view of UKIP, youre posting something from the daily mail. I think in any other circumstance, you wouldnt, because you know how untrustworthy it is. When the independant, the times etc start reporting, ill pay attention. until then, im not.

and as for my coursework and how i must have read some fixed stats, you may be right, but if thats going to be the basis of your argument, no one is going to win against you because you'll believe any evidence we give has been corrupted.

[Gullable]

so basically global warming aint real and its all for money?

[kk.]

if youre gullable

[Ardemax]

oh silly me! i forgot the daily mail is fact. guess ill just have to change my arguement!

[-:Undertaker:-]

great, but we still new renewable energy, whatever way.

and UKIP need to invest on it aswell...

Why do we need renewable energy?

It is uneconomical.

i know how voting works, which is why i said what i said. all im saying is, i think because its your view, and also the view of UKIP, youre posting something from the daily mail. I think in any other circumstance, you wouldnt, because you know how untrustworthy it is. When the independant, the times etc start reporting, ill pay attention. until then, im not.

and as for my coursework and how i must have read some fixed stats, you may be right, but if thats going to be the basis of your argument, no one is going to win against you because you'll believe any evidence we give has been corrupted.

Of course I will post from the Daily Mail, and the Daily Mail is more likely to publish something like this rather than the BBC because the mail is right wing and is sceptical of global warming. Thats the whole point of having an opinion.

I don't point to the Daily Mail when I am posting, I use it as a source for debate. I do not need the Daily Mail or UKIP to tell me what to think, more so the ruling elite (BBC, Guardian, European Union and Government).

oh silly me! i forgot the daily mail is fact. guess ill just have to change my arguement!

Nobody said its complete fact, I think the Mail itself says its being investigated and its what the hackers are claming, not the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail is merely reporting on it while the left wing BBC and others wouldn't dare cover this story.