Forum going down hill?

[Sammeth.]

how about be for agm kk

trying to improve the forum here m8

[Robbie]

I was on about Minstrels the account. He'd certainly post more if his account 'Minstrels' was unbanned. Didn't he have like 15,000 posts on that account?

*REMOVED*

Edit by Sammeth (Assistant General Manager): Please don't divulge confidential information, such as ban details.

[Immenseman]

So surely if he asked for it to be removed, you would? Obviously, it's not up to me and like I said single users don't make the difference. People like him and Wootzeh only caused trouble in my opinion anyway and them being banned is no great loss. Not like they had a high amount of referrals or weekly posts or anything exciting.

[Robbie]

So surely if he asked for it to be removed, you would? Obviously, it's not up to me and like I said single users don't make the difference. People like him and Wootzeh only caused trouble in my opinion anyway and them being banned is no great loss. Not like they had a high amount of referrals or weekly posts or anything exciting.

I personally would unban him as his ban wasn't supposed to be a permanent one, that said it's not down to me.

[StefanWolves]

Wootzeh was a great member :S he contributed a lot. He didn't cause arguments really, that was Clowgon.

[Immenseman]

Which is why he had 4 or whatever permed accounts which must be like 40+ infractions since the turn of the year. That is causing trouble. Anyway, it's not to discuss them, them or no other individual are going to make the forum an interesting place to be again, it has to be the community working together with the senior management.

[Hecktix]

Wootzeh was a great member :S he contributed a lot. He didn't cause arguments really, that was Clowgon.

I don't think this is the time to be throwing accusations around about what members have and haven't done.

If a member has been banned they've been banned and that cannot be mentioned further on the forum.

On topic of management suggestions, unfortunately Habbox is not a democracy (it would be interesting if it was) and the decision of who to hire in higher management rests with Jin and Sierk I guess, moreso Jin, obviously with input of the other AGMs, however I'm certain they'll take note of what the members have suggested.

[Immenseman]

Yeah, absolutely. There is no way Habbox should be a democracy, wouldn't even dream of suggesting that as it just wouldn't work. However, if we can put in suggestions and then senior might see the thinking behind our choices and agree with them or whatever. We know the decision is down to them and it wouldn't work any other way. I mentioned it in the topic because things aren't going to improve until there is a stable management team who can all work together to sort things out. The people I suggested would do this in their suitable roles as far as I'm concerned. Obviously, Jin/Nvr will make the decisions as and when they see fit.

[Robbie]

Lol, can you imagine this forum as a democracy. Voting on rule changes is great but lol imagine who'd be in management

[GoldenMerc]

id be owner at this rate