nick griffin.

nick griffin.
I wouldn't call scientists screwed up freaks. Anyway, if you escaped your bubble of government-controlled media and actually investigated for yourself, rather than being told, I would guarantee your opinion would change. I don't have any intention of causing controversy, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the truth. You realise the majority of the USA do not believe the details of the official 9/11 report? Don't make a judgement like the other inept sheep when you haven't even done your research. Look at science and scientists, look at Operation Northwoods, Pearl Harbour. There are your starting points - go off and investigate and make your own conclusions.I'm the sheep yet you're the one influenced by some socially ******ed freaks posting stupid videos and gaining publicity. Ironic how you mention the media and yet if the media never mentioned the conspiracy theories you wouldn't make such rash judgements, stop being so influenced by persuasive individuals and trying to cause controversy. End of.
Louis knows what he's doing. He's signed them up and he'll make them money, that's his fundamental goal. Note, he never said they were amazing singers, he always went as far as saying they were young boys, who were very entertaining and the public loved them. This much was true.
That + the X-Factor is supposed to be a singing competition = he's a ****.I'm the sheep yet you're the one influenced by some socially ******ed freaks posting stupid videos and gaining publicity. Ironic how you mention the media and yet if the media never mentioned the conspiracy theories you wouldn't make such rash judgements, stop being so influenced by persuasive individuals and trying to cause controversy. End of.
Louis knows what he's doing. He's signed them up and he'll make them money, that's his fundamental goal. Note, he never said they were amazing singers, he always went as far as saying they were young boys, who were very entertaining and the public loved them. This much was true.
We can all bold random phrases in our posts, it makes them look no more impressive, rather just that you're a try hard. What I find funny is you accuse me of being a sheep yet you then go on in your post to explain how you're with the majority of the American in not believing the report? So you believe it's a conspiracy because the majority of American citizens do. That makes perfect sense, they are of course renowned for being the best educated nation across the globe. People like you just crave attention and feel the urge to deviate for said reason.I wouldn't call scientists screwed up freaks. Anyway, if you escaped your bubble of government-controlled media and actually investigated for yourself, rather than being told, I would guarantee your opinion would change. I don't have any intention of causing controversy, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the truth. You realise the majority of the USA do not believe the details of the official 9/11 report? Don't make a judgement like the other inept sheep when you haven't even done your research. Look at science and scientists, look at Operation Northwoods, Pearl Harbour. There are your starting points - go off and investigate and make your own conclusions.
Just wanted to bold a variety of letters to highlight to you how useless you doing that was in that particular post. Let me guess, you think all terrorist attacks are conspiracy to give Governments a reason to attack certain groups of society. Your gall on the subject is ridiculous when you integrate it with how you actually gauged your opinions - from attention seekers, to attract the attention seekers.
Would you like to explain why the US government planned to blow up an aircraft full of American students and blame it on another country as a pretext? I don't need to say anymore.
You're dead to the idea because you don't think it's possible - the same as I was - but when you actually look for yourself, which is the ONLY way to not be biased, you find out things that you wish you never knew.
Last edited by Misawa; 09-12-2009 at 01:22 AM.
I want to try and do this, but how do we make sure the sources we research don't have some sort of media influence? Even if we have a strong source, how do we know it hasn't been manipulated by the US government?Would you like to explain why the US government planned to blow up an aircraft full of American students and blame it on another country as a pretext? I don't need to say anymore.
You're dead to the idea because you don't think it's possible - the same as I was - but when you actually look for yourself, which is the ONLY way to not be biased, you find out things that you wish you never knew.
Well what research can be done? I've been as close as you can get to ground zero so that's no help, besides it was like a decade ago now. All we have is the internet so how can you be sure which information is genuine and which isn't? Obviously newspapers etc won't be, but other official looking data could easily have been manipulated by the government.
My thoughts exactly, lol. Anyway, if you want a debate on it Misawa, create a new thread, I'll be sure to contributeWell what research can be done? I've been as close as you can get to ground zero so that's no help, besides it was like a decade ago now. All we have is the internet so how can you be sure which information is genuine and which isn't? Obviously newspapers etc won't be, but other official looking data could easily have been manipulated by the government.![]()
I was thinkin that but it would turn into;
'I think it was the Taliban'
'I think it was the US government'
'I think it was the Taliban'
'I think it was the US government'
'I think it was the Taliban'
'I think it was the US government'
'I think it was aliens'
'I think it was the Taliban'
'I think it was the US government'
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!