The changes have been implemented and I don't envisage them changing again to anything lower any time in the future, so we'll see how this goes.

Yes - I think 1 year for a rep point is too long.
Yes - 5000 posts for a rep point is far too many.
Yes - The amount of reputation needed for 1 rep point is ridiculous.
No - Scrap reputation altogether.
No - Just reset reputation and have a fresh start.
I do not care about reputation.
The changes have been implemented and I don't envisage them changing again to anything lower any time in the future, so we'll see how this goes.
Sammeth.
Yay, thanks for the changes!
I still think it should be this though...
- 400 points is too low, it should be 500.
- 4000 posts is too high, it should be 2500.
- 30 people to spread is still too high, should be 20.
- 1 year is fine.
Thanks though, better than the way it was! :8
EDIT; Just read the above post, ah well, still good!
Cool, link anybody or what are they?
It's 400 points per
4000 posts per
1 year per
+30 people before you can rep the same people
I think they're all pretty suitable, maybe posts is slightly too high, but other than that, fine. Glad they got implemented fast.
Yeah, it's much better. Well done to Sam for acting on it quickly also. Refreshing to see somebody who listens and doesn't discuss it for at least 8 months.
I agree, if say for example me, I wouldn't expect me to have tonnes of Rep, but I would expect someone who had been on the forum for 3 years to have a reasonable ammount of rep, and I think it should change, but not dramatically, by that I mean, I don't want it to be, 1 rep = 10 posts it would be pointless, I think there should be a reward for startin threads, like 100 threads started, = 1 rep, because I think thread starters are harder to write, and therefore should have more of a reward. But I think it should be 500 posts = 1 rep, or maybe a tiny bit higher, I don't think it should be like 1,000 posts because, some people leave a forum or get bored before they do that many posts and I think, we should run on a points system, well people add to your rep, you should get 10 points and 200 poins = 1 rep, but I don't think Rep, should go up loads. But also I think people should stop givin rep for nothing. Just my opinionYes, I want it to change. However, I genuinely want it to change to aid newer members but still consider the older members who have built their reputation up. By this I mean, don't scrap the system but make it easier for newer members to get higher rep power which as if explained before gives them more of an identity which will hopefully make them stay around the forum for longer than they are doing.
YES NOW TO TAKE OVER THE FORUM WITH REP POWER.
Or something like that. Anyway good show people putting across good arguments and of course that gaylord who put it in place
Who has the highest and what is it? They are in my sights ;l Still Neversoft?
kk just have to work on overtaking you first then
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!